Modernizing Global Governance

Adam Bly
Founder and Chief Executive Officer, System
Share:
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale

Rio+20’s clearest outcome is that civil society and major parts of the private sector are up for the challenges of the 21st century but government is not.

In our work for the UN and the Government of Brazil on the Rio+20 Dialogues, we saw consensus on policy priorities for achieving sustainable economic growth, fighting poverty, advancing social equity, and ensuring environmental protection from citizens in countries with low and high Human Development Index (HDI) scores. These include:

  •  Eliminating fossil fuel subsidies
  •  Restoring deforested and degraded lands
  •  Implementing the right to water
  •  Avoiding ocean pollution by plastics through education and community collaboration
  •  Promoting food systems that are sustainable and contribute to improvement of health
  •  Promoting the use of waste as a renewable energy source in urban environments

That the public’s priorities made their way into the final vision-setting outcome document is an unquestionable success and hopefully, a precedent for how the UN will engage civil society in the future. But the fact that the outcome document does not contain numbers or dates alongside these items is devastating and perilous.

Having the US, Europe, and China in election, economic crisis, and political transition modes, respectively, certainly did not help matters. But I’m not sure political or economic stability in the G20 would have been enough. The fundamental issue is that we are not structured as a globe to legislate for the benefit of the future; and this is no surprise given that many of the world’s powers — the United States perhaps most consequentially — are themselves equally ill-equipped.

Rio+20 must serve as a wake up call for the world that our systems of government – including the constitutional republic – are officially no longer suited for the modern era. While part of the solution will come from networks and emerging technologies that foster civic engagement, real progress will require structural reforms to government itself and a new vision for a national government’s role in a complex, inter-connected world where few major issues are not by their nature planetary.

In the United States, for example, change could look like a lowered voting age, mandatory voting, a lengthened Presidential term, or perhaps even a fourth branch of government constitutionally mandated to protect the future.

Rio+20’s greatest legacy ought to be that it galvanized us to look deeply at how we run the world.

Adam Bly (@adamblyis the founder and CEO of Seed and he was named Young Global Leader by the World Economic Forum in 2007.

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Share:
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

About Us

Events

Media

Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum