Of law and chickens

Irene Khan
Share:
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale

I’m not an economist, but the principle of supply and demand strikes me as a wonderful principle to apply to justice and the rule of law, and a good yardstick to assess their provision.

In much of the developing world, the supply of justice is either well short of demand, or, like the old command economies, rule-of law products are thrown at the market regardless of consumers’ needs.

There is a crisis in the rule of law; there is a crisis of funding that creates shortages. And there is misallocation of resources, which creates distortions, and that in turn leads to a crisis of confidence.

Let me outline what this means. The rule of law is a smart investment. Law-governed societies are morally desirable and economically functional. They generate security as well as wealth. For this reason, choking off rule-of-law assistance is frankly not a clever thing to do. Yet in times of austerity, those projects are among the first to suffer.

When the money is there, too much of it is poured into legal institutions (yes, the brick and mortar kind) that are too far removed from people. Fundamental human rights matter, but if they are to mean anything to people they must have real meaning in their lives. Until the entire world graduates to the constitutional set-ups of rich countries, justice means ensuring fair outcomes in concrete, local terms.

So in settings where a widow’s right to own chickens, say, is a vital concern, the rule of law must be, first and foremost, about securing a customary right to chickens. The chickens are a basic measuring unit for the ability to live with a semblance of dignity.

If we insist on putting in place remote and cumbersome legal systems that don’t work and ignore simple rights that make concrete sense to the poor and marginalized, if no money exists for long-term strategies and what little there is, is misdirected, that’s when confidence wavers. And when confidence wavers, communities and countries waver too.

The rule of law must be less about institutions and more about building people’s confidence in justice systems and enhancing their access to justice. Counting those chickens may sometimes be a good way of measuring the quality of justice.

Author: Irene Khan (@IreneKhan) is the Director-General of the International Development Law Organization, the only inter-governmental organization with a mandate focused on the rule of law.

 Image: The symbol of Justice is seen in a lawyers cabinet REUTERS/Eric Gaillard

 

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Share:
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

About Us

Events

Media

Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum