Geographies in Depth

Is this the cure for the resource curse?

Stella Dawson
Chief Correspondent, Thomson Reuters Foundation
Share:
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Geographies in Depth?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Oil and Gas is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

Oil and Gas

What do the people want?

It’s a simple enough question but one that East African countries rarely ask when it comes to deciding how to use the revenues from their oil and gas discoveries.

A group of American researchers sat down to think of ways that Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda and Mozambique, which have major oil and gas finds, could avoid the rampant corruption, community conflict, violence and poverty commonly called the “resource curse” that has plagued so many resource-rich countries.

They are testing whether talking to citizens about natural resource wealth ahead of time can build trust and help countries make better decisions on how to invest the revenues.

“There is an underlying assumption that the misspending of natural resource revenues is because people demand spending now and they lack foresight,” said Justin Sandefur, research fellow at the Center for Global Development.

“We are interested to see what actually people say when you ask them.”

For Uganda, the results are in.

A poll of 2,714 people in 304 villages conducted in mid-2014 found the top priority was to use oil revenues for social programmes such as health and education, which development experts consider critical to achieving long-term prosperity and growth.

More surprising perhaps was that saving for the future came in second place, followed by infrastructure. This ran counter to the popular view that citizens have a short-term perspective and want to see the money spent now.

The researchers also found a high degree of national consensus. Communities in western Uganda where the oil finds are located and villagers outside the oil-rich region expressed similar priorities, suggesting that if the national government delivered programmes equitably, oil revenues need not stoke the type of inter-regional rivalries seen in Nigeria.

“It comes down to fairness,” said Laura Paler, assistant professor of political science at the University of Pittsburgh who conducted the Uganda research with Guy Grossman from the University of Pennsylvania and Jan Pierskalla at Ohio State University.

The researchers also found citizens have high expectations for the benefits that would flow from oil, hold President Yoweri Museveni’s government in high esteem, and have little willingness for political engagement around accountability and transparency over oil revenues.

The researchers present their findings to civil society groups in Uganda in May.

In Tanzania, Sandefur is completing a similar survey of 2,000 citizens. He also found a high level of interest in social welfare investments and high levels of confidence in the government’s ability to deliver.

The trust in government was a surprise, and holds a lesson for non-governmental organisations, the researchers said.

Foreign donors and NGOs have many programmes to increase community awareness about natural resource revenues, and they focus on pressuring governments and companies to release more data about their extractives contracts.

Many governments prefer to keep its contracts and plans under wraps. In Tanzania, for example, a high-level panel meets behind closed doors to draw up its policy for huge gas reserves. In Uganda, the government called keeping contracts secret a matter of national security.

While government secrecy certainly smacks of enabling corruption and runs counter to the global transparency mantra, this research suggests that NGOs might do well to take a subtler approach when they work with citizens, said Grossman.

In Uganda, people have a “don’t rock the boat” approach toward how the government uses the resource wealth, and if NGOs are antagonistic towards the government, it may not be well received in the oil areas, he said.

Instead, NGOs could do well to focus more work on non-oil regions. A better understanding now in these communities of how revenues will be distributed could avoid inter-community resentments that fuel violence in the future.

“The question of fairness and distribution is key in avoiding the resource curse,” Grossman said.

Their research has not yet been published.

This article is published in collaboration with The Thomson Reuters Foundation. Publication does not imply endorsement of views by the World Economic Forum.

To keep up with the Agenda subscribe to our weekly newsletter.

Author: Stella Dawson is the Chief Correspondent at the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

Image: A worker walks down the stairs of an oil tank. REUTERS/Umit Bektas. 

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Share:
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

What is desertification and why is it important to understand?

Andrea Willige

April 23, 2024

About Us

Events

Media

Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum