How can we defeat shape-shifting malware?

John Walker
Visiting Professor, Nottingham Trent University
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how The Digital Economy is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

The Digital Economy

The FBI and Europol recently brought down a criminal botnet – a network of remotely-controlled PCs – powered by Beebone, an advanced, polymorphic malware capable of shape-shifting up to 19 times a day to prevent detection by antivirus scanners.

By cutting off the command and control (C&C) servers used to issue commands to Beebone, the malware could be more easily located and removed. This particular botnet incorporated around 12,000 infected PCs, but researchers estimate Beebone has infected another 5m computers worldwide.

Widespread use of polymorphic software is a major change in the computer security arms race. In fact it’s Beebone’s polymorphism that has allowed it to remain a continual threat since it appeared way back in 2009.

The first virus

The story of the computer virus or what we now call malware began in 1983, when Fred Cohen wrote a parasitic program that seized control of computers. This was the first computer virus and the first use of the term. Cohen’s test was soon followed by the work of a 15-year-old teenager who wrote Elk Cloner, the first widespread virus which targeted the Apple II computer via the floppy disk.

It’s been a long road since then, with malicious software escalating in capability and complexity resulting in all manner of damage and embarrassing incidents. The infamous Robert Morris Jnr worm in 1988 saw its creator accidentally cripple the early academic internet, for which he received a US$10,000 fine. Fifteen years later in 2003 the Slammer worm crippled the modern internet, practically knocking South Korea off the net. Governments have also got in on the act with Stuxnet and all manner of software used by the NSA and GCHQ as revealed by Edward Snowden’s leaked files.

An arms race escalation

However, one of the most significant changes in the malware landscape was the arrival of one the first polymorphic viruses – the 1260 virus – around 1990. The 1260 virus could change its signature, which hides the appearance of the file to scanners such as antivirus program. It did this by encrypting and decrypting parts of itself while inserting randomly-generated garbage code, which had the effect of padding the size of the file, altering its signature to avoid detection.

The shape-shifting AAEH or Beebone malware arrives as an obfuscated (disguised) piece of Visual Basic code. By faking its identity as an unthreatening file type it tempts the user to run it, using Windows security flaws to gain privileged access (administrator rights) over the machine.

In order to make detection more difficult, its two internal components can each download variants of the other from C&C servers. This makes it harder to detect as each component must be a known version for antivirus scanners to detect the malware correctly. Once the Beebone agent has taken control, those operating it over the internet can send further instructions to the Beebone agent, for example whether to download other malware such as hacking tools, Trojans, keyloggers, or even ransomware such as Cryptolocker.

File signature comparison reveals many different variants of the virus, all widespread.

Computer exploits such as hacking into systems or writing viruses were in the early days chiefly for gaining notoriety more than anything else. But in the last decade the growth of the net and its reach into most parts of society has brought with it criminals looking to profit. Cybercriminal attacks are now estimated to net US$445 billion each year in illicit revenue. Obviously, where there’s money to be made there will be people who will invest – in this case organised crime prepared to pay for the best tools for the job.

Police and investigators have had some success in countering the threat, shutting down several botnets over the last few years. But ultimately with each botnet shut down another springs up to take its place – constructed from software and other people’s compromised computers, a botnet used for criminal means is inherently expendable.

Defences must evolve too

The solution of deploying antivirus scanners to detect and remove malware is looking more and more out of date, as malware grows more capable of defending itself. Beebone, for example, can prevent efforts to remove it by blocking the internet addresses of known security and anti-virus software firms, and preventing anti-virus software from running.

The speed with which so-called zero-day-exploits – security holes known only to those who discovered them, and not the creator of the software – can spread before patches to provide adequate protection can be written has increased with the internet. This means it’s possible to compromise many, many machines before knowledge of the exploit is even public.

There is more to defence now than antivirus scanners alone, and perimeter defences and other forms of intrusion detection systems are able to detect suspicious network traffic rather than just suspicious files. Nevertheless with imaginative and ingenious criminal and programming minds at work, it’s really only skilled and experienced human talent that provide the awareness required – technology alone cannot offer a total solution.

We’ve come a long way since floppy disk viruses were created for fun not profit, but the angles of attack have changed and our defences must change with them.

This article is published in collaboration with The Conversation. Read the original article.

Publication does not imply endorsement of views by the World Economic Forum.

To keep up with the Agenda subscribe to our weekly newsletter.

Author: John Walker is a Visiting Professor at Nottingham Trent University 

Image: A magnifying glass is held in front of a computer screen. REUTERS/Pawel Kopczynski.

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

About Us



Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum