Emerging Technologies

What’s happening in your brain when you decide to be generous?

Bill Hathaway
Associate Director Science and Medicine, Yale
Share:
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Emerging Technologies?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Neuroscience is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

Neuroscience

This article is published in collaboration with YaleNews.

The decision to be generous or not arises from a specific process in the amygdala, a tiny structure deep in the brain long associated with emotions such as fear, according to a new study conducted by researchers at Yale and Duke universities.

1511B28-generosity myanmar world map

“We recorded how these neurons signal complex social behavior in monkeys,” said Steve W.C. Chang, professor of psychology at Yale and lead author of the study, released the week of Dec. 14 in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Science.

In addition, researchers report that monkeys who receive a small dose of the social hormone oxytocin directly in the amygdala are much likely to be generous in their decision-making than animals that don’t receive the hormone. In fact, the patterns of activity in the basolateral amygdala can tell the researchers whether the animal is likely to be generous or selfish in sharing juice with another animal.

Intriguingly, note the researchers, this part of the amygdala has many connections with areas of the prefrontal cortex, where abstract thought and analysis originate.

“And this connectivity is disrupted in disorders such as autism, so it is clearly behaviorally relevant,” Chang said.

What apparently happens in monkeys — and, most likely, in humans — is that initial assessment of the value of things, like drops of juice, to both oneself and to others is made in the basolateral amygdala.

These value-mirroring signals, which were exclusively observed during active decision-making, reflected the monkeys’ tendency to make prosocial decisions on a momentary as well as a long-term basis, the authors noted.

Michael L. Platt, formerly of Duke and now at the University of Pennsylvania, is senior author of the study. The second Yale author of the study is Nicholas Fagan.

Funding for the study was provided by National Institute of Mental Health.

Publication does not imply endorsement of views by the World Economic Forum.

To keep up with the Agenda subscribe to our weekly newsletter.

Author: Bill Hathaway is the Associate Director of Science and Medicine at Yale.  

Image: Brain cells are pictured under the microscope. REUTERS.

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Share:
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

CEOs and CFOs, take note: The 3 pillars of successful GenAI adoption

Kalin Anev Janse and José Parra Moyano

April 22, 2024

About Us

Events

Media

Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum