Global Governance

The Global Security Outlook

The panel moderator Wolfgang Ischinger, Chairman, Munich Security Conference, Germany, Nikolaus von Bomhard, Chairman of the Board of Management, Munich Re, Germany, Shirley Ann Jackson, President, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI), USA, Shinichi Kitaoka, President, Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), Japan, and Tzipi Livni, Knesset, Former Foreign Minister and Co-Leader of the opposition speaking during the session: The Global Security Outlook, at the Annual Meeting 2017 of the World Economic Forum in Davos, January 20, 2017Copyright by World Economic Forum / Ciaran McCrickard

Image: Ciaran McCrickard

Mark Vlasic
Executive Producer, Blood and Treasure, CBS Television Studios
Share:
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Global Governance?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Global Governance is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

Global Governance

This article is part of: World Economic Forum Annual Meeting
Loading...

“Why has it become so hard to predict things?” asked Wolfgang Ischinger, Chairman of the Munich Security Conference. He lamented that some of the smartest minds in the world failed to predict such headlines as ISIS and the Russian occupation of Ukraine.

As explained by Shirley Ann Jackson, President of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, it is “because of the interconnectedness of our societies ... [that] the main challenges are global, but they are networked across domains.” The larger challenge is that events have “cascading consequences” for people in every corner of the world. A particular concern, she reckoned, is the “possible compromise of critical infrastructure that might make use of industrial control systems.” Indeed, she added, policies have not caught up with the Fourth Industrial Revolution.

“The level of uncertainty is unprecedented,” said Nikolaus von Bomhard, Chairman of the Board of Management at Munich Re, who warned about future threats – not just to national infrastructure – but to our very society.

Von Bomhard explained that our “values are being questioned” as never before, complicated by the fact that we are living in a time where “a single event [due to the speed of communication] can change everything.” In reference to the unprecedented challenges, he joked: it seems everything is a “black swan.” To help mitigate this risk, he suggested that policy-makers and politicians “learn from industry and apply what we call integrated risk management” to better prepare for “swans” of all types.

Echoing Ischinger’s comments, Tzipi Livni, Foreign Minister (2009-2012) and Co-Leader of the Opposition, Knesset, Israel, observed, “We know nothing about the future anymore,” adding that, with all its unpredictability and challenges, “There are so many ‘black swans’, I am now looking for the ordinary white swans.”

In this new area of technology, Livni explained, “the power is in people’s hands.” Comparing today’s pace of change to watching a science fiction film in fast-forward, she observed that new technology “is changing everything – it is changing our values.” She explained that Daesh and others are using technology to spread hate, while governments and leaders are acting in new, unconventional ways, where “red lines are being crossed in terms of our values.” In doing so, she argued, our traditional values are being eroded.

For Shinichi Kitaoka, President of the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), the situation in East Asia is “most dangerous”. With all the challenges in the region, Kitaoka lamented that the new US president is now “questioning the relationship with Japan.” He observed that the United States has military bases in Japan, which, according to Kitaoka, “constitutes a benefit to America”.

Jackson agreed that “not enough attention is being paid to Asia, including East Asia.” She added that there is also a “mindset to what confers power and prestige,” which is often linked to military might. The issue for so many of these challenges, including a nuclear North Korea, she suggested, “is what nations – collectively – are willing to do about it.”

The international community can work collectively to address common security challenges. To this end, experts agree that, with the impending youth budge, proper education of today’s youth – and tomorrow’s leaders – will be critical to improve our collective security.

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Share:
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

The World Bank: How the development bank confronts today's crises

Efrem Garlando

April 16, 2024

About Us

Events

Media

Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum