Energy Transition

Energy innovation relies on pricing CO2, according to German government advisors

A general view shows the skyline of the East city center with the TV tower in Berlin, Germany, November 6, 2018.    REUTERS/Fabrizio Bensch - RC155C889AB0

A price on CO2 emissions could boost innovations in key technologies. Image: REUTERS/Fabrizio Bensch

Sören Amelang
Editor in Chief and Executive Director, Clean Energy Wire
Share:
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Energy Transition?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Energy Transition is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

Energy Transition

An expert panel advising the German government has called for a price on CO2 to spur the development of new technologies that are key for the energy transition. “Innovations are driven into the ground without a CO2 price signal,” said Dietmar Harhoff of the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition, who chairs the government’s Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation. The panel also emphasized the key role start-ups play in fostering innovation, but warned that many young companies are starved of capital.

A price on CO2 emissions across all sectors of Germany’s economy would boost innovative technologies and business models that are key for the success of the energy transition, according to the government’s Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation (EFI).

“In order to make innovative and climate-friendly technologies and business models more competitive, taxes and levies on energy across all sectors of the economy should be based on the CO2 content of energy carriers,” the panel said in its annual report [executive summary in English]. The report says the government “should use additional tax revenues from a CO2-oriented tax reform to compensate low-income households who will be particularly burdened by higher energy prices.”

“Innovative technologies and business models can make a decisive contribution to a cost-effective energy transition,” the report said. “It is not primarily a question of inventing new technologies. Many important technologies and business models are already market-ready. However, their diffusion is hindered by low CO2 prices and regulatory constraints.”

Have you read?

The commission provides a yearly analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the German innovation system, and of Germany's appeal as a location for research and innovation.

The experts also recommended reforming electricity grid charges “in order to reflect the actual costs of grid usage.” If companies are rewarded for reducing their electricity use during times when the supply is low, this could create a more flexible grid. The report also suggests a greater focus on "sector coupling,” or using renewable energy to power sectors besides electricity, such as heating and transport.

Results of a survey among energy sector specialists commissioned by the expert panel
Image: Clean Energy Wire

Start-up innovation

The commission also emphasized the role of start-ups in the energy transition and beyond. “Start-ups pursue new business models, and through their innovations, they expand and modernize the range of available products and services,” the commission said. “Start-ups are also trend scouts and provide momentum for established companies.”

But the experts warned that many start-ups in Germany have problems accessing venture capital, especially in their growth phase. They lamented regulations that bar many insurance companies and funds in Germany from high-risk innovation investments.

“Given the shortage of anchor investors in Germany, the Commission of Experts advocates the creation of incentives for institutional investors to invest more heavily in venture capital,” the report says.

The panel was sceptical about the proposal by Germany’s coal commission to shift new research into coal-mining areas to cushion the economic blow from the pending phase-out.

“Start-ups, particularly in the high-tech sector, profit from geographically concentrated ecosystems in which they are able to locate in the immediate vicinity of research institutions, investors, established businesses and other start-ups,” the experts warned. “In order to promote globally visible start-up ecosystems, it is essential not to counteract their geographical concentration.”

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Related topics:
Energy TransitionClimate CrisisFuture of the Environment
Share:
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

What to expect at the Special Meeting on Global Cooperation, Growth and Energy for Development

Spencer Feingold and Gayle Markovitz

April 19, 2024

About Us

Events

Media

Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum