Climate Action

This is how jet planes can help predict the production of ozone

Wildfire environment climate change ozone pollution global warming Big Fall Creek Road United States firefighters forest smoke air quality

With wildfires around the world increasing in frequency, understanding how they work becomes ever more vital. Image: Unsplash/Marcus Kauffman

Robert Perkins
Content and Media Strategist, California Institute of Technology
Share:
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Climate Action?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Science is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

Science

  • Scientists using a jet plane to fly through wildfires have gathered data to better understand the impact of smoke on air quality through the production of ozone.
  • The FIREX-AQ project collected detailed information about the evolving chemistry in the wildfire plumes.
  • One key finding showed that when wildfire smoke mixes with urban pollution, the production of ozone is intensified, making air quality worse for nearby populations.

Using data gathered from a specially equipped jet that spent a month flying through and studying wildfire plumes, scientists have a better understanding now of how wildfire smoke impacts air quality.

Crucially, they found a mechanism for predicting the production of the pollutant ozone -which, at the ground level, can create poor breathing conditions and also harm ecosystems. Also, the team found that mixing wildfire smoke with urban pollution ramps up the production of ozone, meaning that wildfires upwind of cities are a recipe for air quality problems.

Wildfire environment climate change ozone pollution global warming Big Fall Creek Road United States firefighters forest smoke air quality
This jet was attached with a variety of cutting-edge sensors. Image: Caltech

"Of course it is well known that wildfires lower air quality. But it's important to understand the chemical and physical mechanisms by which they do so that we can more effectively forecast how individual fires will impact the communities downwind of them," says Paul O. Wennberg, R. Stanton Avery Professor of Atmospheric Chemistry and Environmental Science and Engineering.

Wennberg is a corresponding author of a paper on the research that was published by Science Advances on 8 December.

The paper draws on data collected through the NASA/NOAA FIREX-AQ project, which spent a month flying missions out of Boise, Idaho, during the summer of 2019. (The project later studied agricultural fires in the Midwest.) Riding a DC-8 that had been converted into a flying laboratory, scientists flew through smoke plumes and gathered information from instruments mounted on the plane. Included in the payload were two instruments from Caltech operated by chemistry graduate students Krystal Vasquez and Hannah Allen, staff scientist John Crounse and lead author Lu Xu, who completed the work as a staff scientist in Wennberg's lab and is now a research scientist with the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES) at the University of Colorado Boulder working in NOAA's Chemical Sciences Laboratory.

Discover

What is the World Economic Forum doing on natural climate solutions?

"Smoke is difficult to study," says Xu. "The chemistry and mixing evolve at scales much smaller than the resolution typically available by remote sensing. Also, it is operationally difficult to sample even from aircraft given the lack of visibility and challenges with air traffic control. FIREX-AQ overcame most of these barriers with a very well instrumented aircraft with flight planning that was highly coordinated with the local air traffic control and the incident control officials fighting the fires."

Have you read?

The FIREX-AQ project collected unprecedently detailed information about the evolving chemistry in the wildfire plumes. This included key observations that explain the chemistry that produces ozone in these fire plumes. The findings from this analysis help researchers understand why fire plumes have widely diverse chemistry: just downwind of the fire, ozone production is vigorous, but the rate of its formation slows as the plume mixes with ambient air. Initially, the plume is primed with a chemical, nitrous acid (HONO, also written as HNO2) that, once emitted into the atmosphere, is converted by sunlight to hydroxyl radical (OH) and nitric oxide (NO) - both key ingredients that drive the formation of ozone from volatile organic compounds (VOCs, which are products of the inefficient combustion of both wood and soil).

Xu, Wennberg, and their colleagues then pored over data and demonstrated that the production of ozone could be predicted as a function the amount of HONO emitted from the fire, the amount of VOCs, and the amount of NO. As the fire plume runs out of NO and HONO, the chemistry slows to a standstill, but importantly the fuel for ozone formation - the VOCs - remains elevated. As such, when these fire plumes mix into urban atmospheres rich in nitric oxide - which is produced by fossil fuel combustion, for example, from cars and trucks - ozone formation will begin again impacting the air quality of the city.

"Wildfires increase regional ozone across the western US during fire season. The episodic nature of wildfires can result in more severe impacts on areas in close proximity to wildfires, as we in the western US frequently experienced in the past few years," says Xu.

Next, the team plans to keep mining the FIREX-AQ data for additional insights. "There are a lot more discoveries about fire chemistry and air quality still to be found in the information gathered through this project," Wennberg says.

The Science Advances paper is titled "Ozone chemistry in western US wildfire plumes." There are numerous co-authors from Caltech; NOAA; NASA; the National Institute of Aerospace, the University of Colorado, Boulder; Florida State University; Georgia Institute of Technology; the Universities Space Research Association; Colorado State University; the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory; the University of Oslo in Norway; the Universität Innsbruck in Austria; Yokohama City University in Japan; and the University of Montana. This analysis and much of the data collected were funded by NASA.

Loading...
Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Related topics:
Climate ActionNature and Biodiversity
Share:
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

Beyond greenwashing: 5 key strategies for genuine sustainability in agriculture

Santiago Gowland

April 24, 2024

About Us

Events

Media

Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum