Opinion
Climate Action

Why it’s time to put urban form on the global climate agenda

Young people playing basketball in Barrio 31, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Young people playing basketball in Barrio 31, Buenos Aires, Argentina Image: Buenos Aires City Government

Blaine Merker
Partner, Director and Head of Climate Action, Gehl Architects
Rushad Nanavatty
Managing Director, Rocky Mountain Institute
This article is part of: Centre for Urban Transformation
  • Urban form is a key driver of carbon pollution, sometimes in surprising ways; per capita emissions are up to three times lower in compact, walkable cities.
  • Despite the pace and pattern of city-building and urban development, urban form remains a deeply neglected topic in global climate discourse.
  • Besides its environmental impact, climate-aligned urbanism improves public health, equity and economic productivity.

Urban sprawl may account for up to 30% of global greenhouse gas emissions. That figure might seem high but sprawl demands more roads, parking, more and larger cars, infrastructure, housing and land.

When factoring in emissions from car dependency, embodied carbon in materials, energy use, food waste, and loss of carbon sinks, the number adds up.

The urban world is growing by the equivalent of a New York City every 45 days – while urban land consumption is increasing 67% faster than urban population growth.

Yet urban land use, urban form and design remain largely absent from global climate discussions. For example, not one of the 93 official 2024 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP29) events featured these topics – though they did have time for sessions dedicated to “space leaders” and “football clubs.”

This is not just an issue of planning – it’s a challenge of imagination. Many still believe growing urban populations require lots of car travel, segregated land uses and more built space per person.

The opposite is true: compact, walkable cities support well-being, opportunity, and far lower emissions. These cities aren’t places of scarcity; they’re places of abundance.

We can align population growth with climate targets by designing cities around people and planet. Per capita emissions in compact, mixed-use cities are typically two to three times lower than national averages.

Countries with similar development levels can have vastly different emissions profiles (US per capita emissions are more than double those of most European countries). The key driver of this difference is urban form.

Low-emissions countries typically have more compact, mixed, multi-modal cities and neighbourhoods – what we call “climate-aligned urbanism.”

Urban versus national greenhouse gas emissions per capita
Image: Gehl | RMI
Have you read?

Climate-aligned urbanism

Climate-aligned urbanism shapes how we move, consume and live, reducing our environmental impact in five key ways.

1. Car dependency

Low-density development discourages mass transit and walking or biking. Greater reliance on cars requires more roads and parking, fueling further sprawl.

In climate-aligned urbanism, amenities and services are closer to home and better connected to transportation, enabling more efficient, social and active mobility.

2. Embodied carbon

Building single-family houses in suburbia requires more materials and embodied carbon. A typical mid-rise housing unit has 40% less embodied carbon than a single-family home.

And then there’s the embodied carbon in accompanying infrastructure; London’s lower density means its road material stock is three to four times that of Istanbul and Buenos Aires.

3. Energy use

Bigger homes negate efficiency gains. A US single-family home uses almost three times more energy than apartments in multi-unit buildings. Sprawl also requires more energy to distribute electricity and water.

Energy use per household
Image: Gehl | RMI

4. Forest loss

Between 1970 and 2010, 60% of urban expansion replaced agricultural land, often the most fertile. Displaced agriculture moves to less productive land, requiring more of it and more inputs like water and fertilizer. Business-as-usual patterns of development threaten 5–8% of our remaining forests.

5. Food waste

In wealthy nations, over half of food waste happens at home, driven by large, infrequent purchases. This occurs when suburban residents shop in bulk rather than buying fresh food locally. Higher population densities mean less per-person food waste.

What are the solutions?

Wherever possible, we must prioritize retrofitting cities, preserving the resources, energy and investments already built into them. Building on undeveloped land (known as “greenfield” development) should be rare but excellent.

Any city can promote infill development, remove restrictions on multi-family housing, lift parking requirements, develop cycling and pedestrian infrastructure and build more homes and commercial clusters close to high-quality transit to move toward climate-aligned urbanism.

In the United States, intelligently addressing America’s chronic housing shortage – building more housing where most people need it – can deliver climate impact similar to the country’s most aspirational transportation decarbonization policy.

The guiding principle that makes climate-aligned urbanism work is attention to the human scale – of how people truly like to live, work and move – and it is already happening worldwide:

  • Shanghai’s 50 kilometres of new routes have connected 4.8 million residents to the public spaces along the Huangpu River within a 15-minute bike ride.
  • Sydney redesigned George Street, once the city’s most congested street, as a people-centred public space that moves 8,000 transit riders per hour.
  • Buenos Aires introduced 27 upgraded public spaces into its largest informal settlement to create a walkable neighbourhood and introduced infill housing.
  • Indianapolis invested $27 million in biking infrastructure downtown, catalyzing $170 million in private housing and commercial redevelopment; now, 70% of residents say they get more exercise and downtown revenue has increased by two-thirds.

Climate-aligned urbanism offers numerous co-benefits, from improved public health to greater economic equity. For instance, walkable urban design alone can boost the likelihood of residents meeting the World Health Organization’s recommended weekly exercise minimum by more than 50%.

Because walking and cycling require little to no investment from users, walkable neighbourhoods provide the equivalent of a $5,000–$10,000 living expense subsidy, freeing up personal income.

Dense, walkable neighbourhoods are also more economically productive per acre, see 1.5 times more spending per visit and have a 35-44% premium on real estate value over auto-oriented alternatives.

Climate-aligned urbanism means vibrant economies
Image: Gehl | RMI

Given the lower infrastructure cost per resident in denser neighbourhoods, this higher productivity provides a more sustainable long-term tax base to maintain that infrastructure.

Achieving a better urban form is one of the most powerful things we can do for the climate – and it also means we need to build many fewer clean energy assets to reach net zero.

We will need fewer electric vehicles, solar farms, wind turbines, batteries and land (and have fewer siting and permitting battles), making the energy transition faster, easier and cheaper. This will also mean better health, greater equity and stronger economic development.

Climate-aligned urbanism would make it much easier, faster and cheaper to get to net-zero emissions
Image: Gehl | RMI

Climate-aligned urbanism offers an abundant, positive life – not scarcity – and a blueprint for a just, prosperous and irresistible urban future.

Contributors to the research and writing behind this article include Yuki Numata (RMI), Marissa Maze (RMI), Julia Meisel (RMI), Laurie Stone (RMI), Ben Holland (WRI), Brett Merriam (Gehl) and Wallace Cotton (Gehl).

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Stay up to date:

Cities and Urbanization

Related topics:
Climate ActionSustainable DevelopmentUrban Transformation
Share:
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Cities and Urbanization is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

Why you should care about the Third Pole and its crucial role as a global water resource

Hamish Pritchard and Helen Millman

December 13, 2024

The 3 climate priorities humanitarians need to boost their impact

About us

Engage with us

  • Sign in
  • Partner with us
  • Become a member
  • Sign up for our press releases
  • Subscribe to our newsletters
  • Contact us

Quick links

Language editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

Sitemap

© 2024 World Economic Forum