Climate Action

How direct biomass estimation can improve forest carbon accounting

aerial view of rainforest in blog about biomass measurements for carbon accounting

Measurement of forest biomass from space could revolutionize our understanding of forest carbon dynamics. Image: Unsplash/Geio Tischler

Marco Albani
Chief Executive Officer and Co-Founder, Chloris Geospatial
  • Direct biomass measurement from space is now a reality, promising to revolutionize our understanding of forest carbon dynamics.
  • After questions over the value of voluntary carbon markets, such innovative new technologies could help them improve their integrity.
  • Here's why direct biomass estimation offers a golden opportunity to improve the transparency and scalability of carbon accounting.

New spaceborne sensors and machine learning innovation have made trustworthy direct measurement, verification and reporting of forest biomass from space a reality, with these tools promising to revolutionize our understanding of forest carbon dynamics.

Forest carbon accounting standards – both for carbon markets and for environmental, social and governance (ESG) applications – can leverage these capabilities to achieve the integrity they need to scale.

Have you read?

The last year has been a rollercoaster in the voluntary carbon markets. Until recently, the market for voluntary carbon credits had seen massive growth, with the primary voluntary carbon markets value growing about tenfold from 2017 to 2022, according to MSCI Carbon Markets.

Then, in early 2023, a series of news and magazine articles called into question the effectiveness of voluntary carbon credits, and in particular that of carbon credits based on nature-based solutions, with claims that up to 90% of those credits do not represent genuine reductions in emissions or sequestration.

Alongside all the other macro disruptions of 2023, this brought a substantial contraction in the primary market value of voluntary carbon, which erased almost all of 2022’s growth.

While critics of market-based solutions to the climate crisis might see this as a good thing, this market correction results in a reduction of private capital flows to critical climate action at a time where public budgets are under pressure from rising interest rates and from increasing defence spending triggered by geopolitical tensions.

To recover, it is clear that voluntary carbon markets need to improve their integrity and transparency. Technological innovation provides an important avenue for these necessary improvements.

Technology can improve integrity of carbon accounting

New spaceborne sensors and machine learning innovation have made trustworthy direct biomass measurement a reality.

Since the 2000s, the introduction of airborne and spaceborne LiDAR instruments and the advances in machine learning have created the opportunity to directly measure forest biomass at increasingly fine spatial and temporal resolution.

Direct biomass stock and change estimations, like those produced by Chloris Geospatial, provide insights that are impossible to obtain with traditional approaches.

Direct biomass stock and change estimations provide insights that are impossible to obtain with traditional approaches.
Direct biomass stock and change estimations provide insights that are impossible to obtain with traditional approaches. Image: Chloris Geospatial

These innovations create more than acceptably accurate overall estimates of carbon fluxes for large areas, which would be both impractical and prohibitively expensive to obtain with airborne and near-surface sensors, while providing spatial and temporal resolution that is impossible to achieve with field campaigns.

At Chloris, this is something that we have proven through extensive validation of our data and through benchmarking against fully independent data sets, like the one carried out by the Ecosystem Restoration Standard.

Like Galileo’s telescope, direct biomass estimation brings a Copernican revolution in our understanding of forest carbon dynamics. It does more than providing a cost-effective and scalable alternative to traditional approaches – it makes a new level of understanding in carbon accounting possible, through three major improvements:

1. Direct estimation paints the full greenhouse gas flux picture

By monitoring all carbon stock changes, direct estimation sees all carbon losses – both deforestation and degradation – but also carbon gains through removals from the growth of forest remaining forest. We can now operationally monitor and include processes that until now were either inferred or simply excluded.

2. Estimations produce both figures and maps

Direct estimates of biomass change don’t tell you only how much the carbon has changed, but also where and when those changes occurred, improving our understanding of the drivers of change and the design of management activities.

3. Direct estimation is consistent across scales

A spatially explicit, consistent method from farm to continent enables a much better outcome-based understanding of the impact of projects and programmes, comparing the dynamics of different areas of interest, allowing for dynamic baselining, synthetic controls, and nesting of attribution of outcomes between efforts and processes happening at different levels.

Loading...

Forest carbon accounting standards – both for carbon markets and for ESG applications – can leverage this technology to achieve the integrity they need to scale.

To date, direct biomass estimation has been excluded from many carbon accounting methodologies, possibly on grounds of concerns about its perceived accuracy, scientific foundation and provider neutrality.

But there is more and more evidence that these concerns are unfounded. The approach is supported by multiple peer-reviewed scientific papers, and an increasing number of service providers can make this technology available to stakeholders and market participants.

Benefits of direct biomass estimation

At the same time the biggest concerns raised about the integrity of nature-based solutions in the carbon markets have nothing to do with the accuracy of carbon stock and change measurements, but with the approach used to determine baselines and additionality. These are areas where a scalable approach like direct biomass estimation offers massive benefits.

Discover

What’s the World Economic Forum doing about deforestation?

Finally, direct biomass measurement is simpler, more direct, and easier to understand than the current emission factor and activity data approach, making it a better choice to ensure carbon accounting is not only robust and accurate, but also understandable to all participants.

All in all, direct biomass estimation offers a golden opportunity to improve the transparency and scalability of carbon accounting at a time where climate action is more urgent than ever – let’s embrace this innovation.

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Stay up to date:

Climate Crisis

Related topics:
Climate ActionNature and Biodiversity
Share:
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Climate Crisis is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

How climate change and water stress is risking the semiconductor supply chain

Josh Lepawsky and Helen Millman

December 2, 2024

What are keystone species, and why do they matter?

About us

Engage with us

  • Sign in
  • Partner with us
  • Become a member
  • Sign up for our press releases
  • Subscribe to our newsletters
  • Contact us

Quick links

Language editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

Sitemap

© 2024 World Economic Forum