Future of the Environment

A chemical sponge for carbon capture

Matthew Hill
Australian Research Council Future Fellow and leader of the Integrated Nanoporous Materials team, CSIRO
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Future of the Environment?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Future of the Environment is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

Future of the Environment

Looking back, a career in science was always on the cards. When I was about four, for behaving myself I wanted to be allowed to add lots of numbers up. Growing up in Western Sydney, we didn’t have much, and a long university degree didn’t really match the budget.

What made the difference was my mother deciding that my sister and I were going to university no matter what, even though no one in our family had gone before.

As I headed to university, I thought I’d be a mathematician, but it turned out I just wasn’t quite good enough. I also really enjoyed chemistry, so I got into a labcoat.

My PhD at UNSW with Rob Lamb got me fired up about linking fundamental chemistry to an applied problem – what I was working on could one day be useful outside the lab.

When I joined CSIRO, Anita Hill had a great thing going with porous materials – we were interested in anything with lots of holes in it. It made sense to work with what had the most holes – that was the best way to break new ground.

Metal organic frameworks, or MOFs, are metal atoms joined to each other by organic linkers. When the chemistry is right, they form a structure that looks like a building scaffold. From the outside, they look like a sugar or salt crystal, but inside, every atom in the structure is exposed to empty space, meaning that up to 80% of the crystal is empty – made up of nothing.

All of those atoms inside the structure exposed to empty space make for a huge amount of surface. Many MOFs have over 5,000 square metres of surface area per gram – like having a soccer field inside a teaspoon worth of powder.

First off I was inspired by chemists such as Richard Robson and Jeff Long who had shown you could use all this surface like a sponge.

For example, it is possible to soak up natural gas into a MOF. If you put this powder into a tank, it turns out you can store many times more gas in the same place as if you compressed it – the sponge effect is that strong. So, a car powered by natural gas, which could be cheaper and cleaner, could carry enough gas to drive as far as a petrol one.

My team and I designed MOFs to store huge amounts of hydrogen and natural gas fuel, and to capture carbon dioxide in massive quantities as well.

We even made a MOF sponge that could wring itself out when exposed to the sun. Most of the energy used for capturing carbon dioxide goes to regenerating your capture material, so using sunlight is an attractive alternative.

The other thing about MOFs is that the holes are all the same size. Like a flour sieve, the holes can separate big from small. I was interested but didn’t know much about this, so I was lucky that Rich Noble at University of Colorado Boulder let me visit for a while to learn.

We thought that adding these MOF powders to polymer membranes – thin plastic sheets – would help one gas to pass through faster than another. It’s the best way to get natural gas, oxygen or water ready for us to use.

Sure enough, we saw an improvement, but we also stumbled upon an even more exciting effect. These plastic sheets don’t last very long, collapsing down on themselves – they age. After a few weeks the gases don’t go through very fast any more.

We found that one specific MOF seemed to form a special mixture, propping the sheets open, making them last for years instead of weeks. Today we are developing these anti-ageing membranes for a platform of applications, from defence to agriculture and energy.

When I first started, making a teaspoon of a MOF was a major undertaking. We knew that they would never be useful unless large amounts could be made efficiently.

With Tash Polyzos we took reaction times from 72 hours to 1.2 minutes using continuous flow chemistry.

This is the future of chemical synthesis because reactions happen faster and cleaner, and it was a game changer for MOFs.

Now we can make MOFs for a myriad of uses, but also have enough of them to make it worthwhile.

Published in collaboration with The Conversation

Author: Dr Matthew Hill from Australia’s CSIRO is the winner of the Malcolm McIntosh Prize for Physical Scientist of the Year, one of the Prime Minister’s Prizes for Science.

Image: Dr Matthew Hill of CSIRO holds a chemical model. Courtesy Wildbear.

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Related topics:
Future of the EnvironmentChemical and Advanced MaterialsFuture of Work
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

1 in 5 migratory species are at risk of extinction, says a new UN report

Simon Torkington

February 21, 2024

About Us



Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum