Is gene editing the answer to sickle cell disease?

Researchers from Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorders Center have found that changes to a small stretch of DNA may circumvent the genetic defect behind sickle cell disease. The discovery, outlined today in the journal Nature, opens a promising path for developing gene-editing approaches to treat the disease and other hemoglobin disorders.

This stretch of DNA, called an enhancer, controls a molecular switch that determines whether a red blood cell produces the adult form of hemoglobin — which in sickle cell disease is mutated — or a fetal form that is unaffected by and counteracts the effects of the mutation. Other studies have indicated that sickle-cell patients with elevated levels of fetal hemoglobin have a milder form of the disease.

The new study was led by Stuart Orkin of Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s, who is also David G. Nathan Professor of Pediatrics at Harvard Medical School (HMS); Daniel Bauer, also of Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s and an assistant professor of pediatrics at HMS; and Feng Zhang of the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard. The research was spurred by the discovery that naturally occurring beneficial variations in the DNA sequence in this enhancer dial down the molecular switch only in red blood cells.

To mimic and improve upon the effects of these variations, the research team used recently developed gene-editing tools to cut out tiny sections of DNA step by step along the entire length of the enhancer in blood stem cells from human donors. The researchers allowed the cells to mature into red blood cells and found that the amount of fetal hemoglobin the cells produced had increased substantially.

The team’s experiments revealed a specific location in the enhancer that, when cut, leads to production of high levels of fetal hemoglobin. Parallel experiments in an animal model revealed that removal of this part of the enhancer affected the molecular switch’s expression only in red blood cells, not in immune or brain cells, where the switch is also active. These findings show that the effects are restricted to red blood cells, and that other cell types are unaffected.

“There was no efficient way of conducting this kind of experiment until now,” said Bauer, a pediatric hematologist/oncologist at Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s. “Our goal was to break the enhancer, rather than fix the hemoglobin mutation, but to do so in very precise ways that are only possible since gene-editing technologies … became available.”

Interest in exploring the potential clinical uses of the molecular switch, called BCL11A, has grown since Orkin’s laboratory revealed its direct role in the transition from fetal to adult hemoglobin in Nature in 2009. Another important step came in 2013, when the journal Science published their report of the discovery of the enhancer that directs expression of BCL11A only in red blood cells.

“We’ve now targeted the modifier of the modifier of a disease-causing gene,” said Orkin, a leader of Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s who serves as chairman of pediatric oncology at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and associate chief of hematology/oncology at Boston Children’s Hospital. “It’s a very different approach to treating disease.”

The data provide proof of principle that targeted edits to BCL11A’s enhancer in blood stem cells could be an attractive approach for curing sickle cell disease and related conditions.

“These experiments may have revealed the genetic Achilles’ heel of sickle cell disease,” said Orkin. “Alterations to these specific portions of the enhancer have the same effect as knocking the whole enhancer out altogether, suggesting that this could be a promising strategy to translate into the clinic.”

“Although fixing the sickle mutation itself would seem the most straightforward approach, it turns out that blood stem cells, the ultimate targets for this kind of therapy, are much more resistant to genetic repair than to genetic disruption,” Bauer added. “Therefore, making a single DNA cut that breaks the enhancer solely in blood stem cells could be a much more feasible strategy.”

Orkin and Bauer are also affiliated with Harvard Medical School and the Harvard Stem Cell Institute; Orkin is an investigator with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. Other members of the research team include lead authors Matthew C. Canver, Elenoe C. Smith, Falak Sher, Luca Pinello, and Neville E. Sanjana, as well as co-authors Ophir Shalem, Diane D. Chen, Patrick G. Schupp, Divya S. Vinjamur, Sara P. Garcia, Sidinh Luc, Ryo Kirita, Yukio Nakamura, Yuko Fujiwara, Takahiro Maeda, and Guo-Cheng Yuan.

This article is published in collaboration with Harvard Gazette. Publication does not imply endorsement of views by the World Economic Forum.

To keep up with the Agenda subscribe to our weekly newsletter.

Author: Thomas Ulrich, Dana-Farber, Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorders Center

Image: A nurse poses for a photo in a trauma center of the University of Mississippi Medical Center in Jackson, Mississippi. REUTERS/Jonathan Bachman