Geographies in Depth

Can better spatial planning transform South Asian cities?

Jon Kher Kaw
Senior Urban Specialist, South Asia Urban Unit, World Bank
Share:
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Geographies in Depth?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Infrastructure is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

Infrastructure

South Asia’s urbanization has been described as “messy, hidden and underleveraged.” A lot has to do with how South Asian countries manage their cities’ spatial development.

Having visited many cities in South Asia, the sight of the built environment in the region is a familiar one–a rapid expansion of built-up areas and an accompanying low-density sprawl that has, all too often, gone hand-in-hand with poorly managed transportation systems, planning constraints, underutilized land, and a lack of institutional capacity and resources. These forces result in high land and rental costs that make it extremely challenging for cities to support affordable housing and commercial space, and to maintain a livable public realm.

Between 1999 and 2010, the region’s cities grew about twice as fast in area as they grew in population, which suggests declining average city population densities and increasing sprawl. And when the growth of a city’s footprint exceeds the rate at which it can expand infrastructure and regulate development, spatial planning and services provision typically suffer. The implications are severe, especially when the region’s urban population is estimated to rise by almost 250 million people by 2030.

If South Asian cities are to continue harboring the promise of better livelihoods and living conditions for their citizens, then addressing the ability of South Asian countries to manage their cities’ spatial development is critical, in order to alleviate congestion pressures that undermine a city’s livability and hamper agglomeration economies; and to prevent their cities from being further locked in to a pattern of urban sprawl that is prohibitively costly to reverse.

While every city faces its own unique set of circumstances, histories and political economy, the opportunities for planners, government policy makers, and stakeholders to better manage the spatial structure and intra- and interurban connectivity are there. These can be tackled at several levels:

•     Investing in transport links that improve connectivity between cities to create more efficient systems of cities. It is also critical to invest in improved intracity connectivity and traffic management to enhance mobility within urban areas and ease traffic congestion.

•     Adopting forward-looking approaches to planning and guiding expansion where it is most rapid—on city peripheries. This approach will reduce the messiness of urbanization, prevent undesirable spatial forms from being locked in, and facilitate future provision of infrastructure and basic urban services.

•     Unlocking the potential of city cores and carry out rejuvenation where cores have declined by investing in improvements such as better public urban spaces to enhance pedestrian walkability and livability. Promote better management of developable land in city cores through effective land-assembly mechanisms; making better use of publicly owned land; and reusing existing structures in an adaptive, appropriate, and innovative manner.

•     Most importantly, strengthening institutional capacity to plan, coordinate, implement, and enforce development to deliver integrated, coordinated, and smarter planning policies. By so doing, facilitate the formation of more vibrant neighborhoods and public space through granular and contextual spatial planning approaches. Land use planning must constantly adapt to changes in market demand within a framework that takes a long-term view of a city’s development.

There are a handful of successful examples of well-planned cities and initiatives in South Asia but in general, many South Asian cities must face these challenges and decide if they want to continue on the same path or undertake appropriate actions to transform the region’s trajectory of development towards a more prosperous and livable one.

Read the full report and its policy recommendations on managing spatial structure and connectivity in chapter 4 of the recently launched publication on “Leveraging Urbanization in South Asia: Managing Spatial Transformation for Prosperity and Livability”.

This post first appeared on The World Bank End Poverty in South Asia Blog.

Publication does not imply endorsement of views by the World Economic Forum.

To keep up with the Agenda subscribe to our weekly newsletter.

Author: Jon Kher Kaw is a Senior Urban Specialist with the South Asia Urban Unit at the World Bank, based in Washington, DC.

Image: A view of traffic on a street on the first day after a week-long nationwide transport blockade in Dhaka. REUTERS/Rafiqur Rahman (BANGLADESH)

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Share:
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

How can Japan navigate digital transformation ahead of a ‘2025 digital cliff’? 

Naoko Tochibayashi and Naoko Kutty

April 25, 2024

About Us

Events

Media

Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum