How has Ebola led to an increase in teenage pregnancy?

Cassie Werber
Writer, Quartz Africa
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Africa?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Africa is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:


This article is published in collaboration with Quartz Africa

This post has been corrected.

While the Ebola outbreak raged through Sierra Leone, Liberia, and Guinea in the summer of 2014, public life ground to a halt. The danger of congregating in groups meant that public institutions, like schools, shut down. But the months of sickness and segregation left a legacy for girls that’s only now starting to be felt: teenage pregnancy spiked, and some of the girls are now being victimized by the government’s education policies.

Data on teenage pregnancy in West Africa is difficult to obtain, especially as it’s often stigmatized and underreported. But Plan International, a children’s charity, said back in 2014 that teenage pregnancy rates in West Africa—already among some of the world’s highest—were on the rise. They pointed to enforced inactivity and lack of oversight: girls forced to stay out of school due to Ebola “become more vulnerable to sexual exploitation, sexual assault and rape.”

That grim story is now playing out. A study by the United Nations Development Programme said that in Sierra Leone teenage pregnancy increased by 65% due to the socioeconomic condition imposed by Ebola. A survey of 1,100 girls and boys, also in Sierra Leone, by Save the Children in June 2015 found that most girls interviewed thought teenage pregnancy was rising, and 10% said more girls were being forced to sell sex due to loss of family, and with it, financial security. Fear of sexual assault was common, and the children told stories of girls attacked and raped, even in Ebola-quarantined households.

Teen pregnancy rates were already high. In 2013, 28% of all girls aged 15-19 were already pregnant or had children, according to government data. Sierra Leone sees few rape convictions but violence against women is “commonplace,” UNDP said.

These higher rates, and the violence and lack of education that contributes to them, are bad enough. But Sierra Leone has also implemented a policy which seems designed to worsen the situation. Pregnant girls are excluded from school, and from taking tests: a policy that has been gathering strength for several years, but was reiterated by the country’s government in the wake of the Ebola epidemic. Leaders have said the presence of pregnant girls will “serve as a negative influence to other innocent girls,” and “encourage” them to get pregnant, according to a Nov. 6 report by Amnesty International.

Enforcement of the ban is up to school authorities, according to Amnesty interviews with mainly under-18 girls, which has led to widespread degrading treatment. Girls suspected of being pregnant were publicly examined, having their breasts or stomachs felt by teachers and nurses on school premises. Some were compelled by their schools to take urine tests.

The exclusion from education, and the public humiliation, amounts to an abuse of the girls’ human rights, Amnesty said. In May 2015, the government put in place some provisions for a “bridging” system, to teach an estimated 3,000 pregnant girls separately, and lessons began a couple of weeks ago. (Amnesty says the total number of pregnant teenages is much higher than that. It also notes that the “bridging” system does nothing to change girls’ exclusion, or the stigma attached to the ban).

Amnesty’s report notes that, even where “tests” are inadequate to keep pregnant girls out of education, shame does the rest. “Girls described acute embarrassment and fear at being subjected to this treatment when they tried to attend school or sit exams,” they wrote. Once girls have missed out on months of classes and key exams, have a child to look after, and are under more financial pressure than before, it becomes increasingly less likely they’ll ever go back to school.

Correction (Nov. 9): An earlier version of this story said “bridging” lessons had not yet begun, but UNICEF confirmed they began in October 2015.

Publication does not imply endorsement of views by the World Economic Forum.

To keep up with the Agenda subscribe to our weekly newsletter.

Author: Cassie Werber writes about renewable energy, politics and society, management and the arts for Quartz.

Image: A woman holds her newborn baby in a nursery. REUTERS/Andreea Campeanu. 

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

Two-thirds of Africa’s birds of prey are on the brink of extinction. Here's why that could be bad news for humans

Madeleine North

February 15, 2024

About Us



Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum