Education and Skills

This is what happens when civil servants put celebrities to work

Paint in different colors are seen on a table at an art class for children. Image: REUTERS/Kai Pfaffenbach

Alexander Starritt
Editor, Apolitical
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Education and Skills?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how United States is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

United States

Some of the worst-performing schools in America have been turned around by an arts programme mobilising stars like Elton John, Yo Yo Ma and Cameron Diaz to help failing pupils.

What makes the programme unusual, rather than just an exercise in celebrity, is that it has used the arts throughout the curriculum as not just a pleasant add-on, but as a means of driving achievement in the core subjects. An independent study of the schools’ results showed a 23% increase in maths scores and a 13% improvement in reading in only three years.

The arts are not just a flower, they’re a wrench

A huge leap in themselves, those results also far outpace those for schools spending comparable amounts of money, but not using it for the arts. Rachel Goslins, the public servant who set it up, says: ‘Our motto is that the arts are not just a flower, they’re a wrench.’

This arts-centred approach presents a stark contrast to the widespread teaching philosophy known as ‘drill and kill’, which tries to scrape out a minimum result for the worst-performing pupils with highly regimented, repetitive rote learning.

The programme, called Turnaround: Arts, was set up by Barack Obama’s Presidential Committee on the Arts and Humanities in 2012. It is 70% funded by private business and philanthropic foundations, with a budget of only around $2.5million. It works in 49 schools drawn from the lowest 5% in the US.

Fewer than 15% of high schools produce half of the nations 1.3 million dropouts.

In these chronically floundering institutions, where waves of reform have come and gone in vain, the megawattage of stardom is used to try and shock pupils, teachers and parents into believing that, this time, something really is about to change.

The actors and musicians help direct school plays, give acting classes, talk to carers about their problems and pre-record phone calls inviting parents to parent-teacher evenings. Adopting a particular school, many of the stars have built up deep relationships with them since the programme began.

We don’t have metrics for joy

Ms Goslins emphasises that turning around a failing school is as much about reinvigorating demoralised teachers and remaking institutional culture as it is about directly academic intervention. She says, ‘There are some things we can’t measure. We don’t have metrics for creativity, we don’t have metrics for joy.’

That capacity for creating joy can be harnessed for demonstrable academic improvement. In a school play, for example, the parents who tend not to participate in their children’s education are targeted for costume committees; children with behavioural problems are cast in the lead parts and the whole performance is used as a means of bringing the wider community inside the school. The results show that engagement leads to better attendance and better grades.

But it’s not all greasepaint and stardust. This is the high-profile end of a thoroughgoing integration of the arts – such as music, dance or storytelling – into the teaching of other subjects. The furthest extreme might be a hip-hop-physics dance class where the teacher leads a call-and-response set of questions about the scientific principles underlying the dance: ‘What do we use to get into the turn?’ – ‘Momentum!’

At a more sedate level, it means using movement, the senses and the arts’ communicative power to get through to the hardest-to-reach pupils. Those could be children with special needs, with English as a second language, or simply those who have been turned in on themselves by an environment of poverty and low expectation.

Without the arts, you can’t complete an education

To make this possible, the programme trains teachers in these techniques, while bringing in partner organisations to provide materials. Crayola gives each school art supplies worth $10,000; the NAMM foundation supplies musical instruments; the rights agency Music Theatre International has turned over free licences to its musicals in perpetuity.

But despite the impressive academic results, the scheme’s proponents argue that its real value is far more profound. ‘We’ve got the data for the people with the purse strings, but without the arts you can’t complete an education, you can’t complete a person. We aren’t making artists, we’re making neighbours, citizens,’ says Alfre Woodard, the Oscar-nominated 12 Years A Slave actress, who has been involved with the programme since the beginning.

At the schools she has adopted, Ms Woodard teaches drama classes for children closed off by trauma, poverty and violence. ‘It’s not teaching acting, it’s unlearning, unravelling the armour we all start to put on from childhood. It’s stripping that away to get to the natural person who expresses who they are already, as human beings unencumbered.’

The programme, however, will have to adapt to survive. Because it was set up by appointees of outgoing president Barack Obama, there is a danger that it would fall victim to the change of administration. Its supporters are presently trying to institutionalise it and so allow to it carry on.

And although the programme’s many partisans are careful always to frame their work in the indisputable terms of maths, reading and attendance, Ms Woodard perhaps expresses best why they are so determined to see it continue: ‘We do it because all of us artists know that the arts change lives. Not that they made us rich and famous, but that they gave us a place in a world, somewhere we felt we had a value and could give something, they gave us a language. The artists, too, walk away deeper. It changes us too.’

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Related topics:
Education and SkillsArts and Culture
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

How focused giving can unlock billions and catapult women’s wealth

Mark Muckerheide

May 21, 2024

About Us



Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum