Which countries are worst affected by tax avoidance?
Tax avoidance is a global issue. Image: REUTERS/Pichi Chuang
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:
Corruption
What would you do with $500 billion? The first challenge might be actually getting your head around quite how much money that is. If you like to travel in style you could buy 1,150 Airbus A380s, according to the published Airbus list price. If you just wanted to show off, you could cover a football field to a depth of 1.5 metres with cash.
So, it’s a lot of money. It’s also the amount of revenue the world is losing as a result of tax avoidance, according to a new report from the United Nations World Institute for Development Economics Research (pdf).
Corporate tax is a vital source of government revenue across the globe. It is especially vital in developing countries, argue the report’s authors. Their findings highlight the extent of global tax avoidance - as well as the countries facing the biggest shortfalls.
Who’s hardest hit by this lost revenue?
Well, it depends how you look at it.
Building on an earlier IMF study, the report offers two different perspectives - overall loss estimates, and losses as a percentage of GDP.
In terms of overall losses, you probably won’t be surprised to see some of the world’s biggest economies at the top. Given the size and strength of their economies, they’ve racked up significant losses. The US loses an estimated $188 billion every year, with China a distant second at $66.8 billion.
This chart from Statista gives a snapshot of the situation in some of the world’s major economies - all totting up losses of more than a billion dollars.
The report emphasises the significance of the losses as a percentage of GDP: “The intensity of losses is substantially greater in low- and lower middle-income countries: and in sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean and in South Asia compared to other regions.”
The chart below shows the countries worst affected as a percentage of GDP.
In contrast, the figure for the US is 1.13%, and for China just 0.75%.
Is the problem getting worse?
Again, it depends on how you look at it.
Overall losses have increased - especially in OECD countries - since 1980, as this chart from the report shows.
However, the situation does look different as a percentage of GDP. Using this measure, a much more varied picture emerges.
Is anything being done?
The OECD’s BEPS project has been working on this issue since 2013. More than 100 countries and jurisdictions are currently working together to tackle base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS).
The 15 point action plan aims to “close gaps in international tax rules that allow multinational enterprises to legally but artificially shift profits to low or no-tax jurisdictions”.
The OECD says that the project is especially significant in developing countries - those most affected by revenue loss, as the UN-WIDER report makes clear. It aims to engage them in the global tax agenda to make sure their needs are met.
The issue was also on the agenda at this year’s World Economic Forum Annual Meeting in Davos. The session ‘Taxation without Borders: A Fair Share from Multinationals’ looked at the action needed - particularly in the wake of the leak of the Panama Papers, which exposed the use of tax havens around the world.
Don't miss any update on this topic
Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.
License and Republishing
World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.
The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.
The Agenda Weekly
A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda
You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.
More on Economic GrowthSee all
Linda Lacina and Ian Shine
September 25, 2024
Spencer Feingold
September 25, 2024
Aengus Collins and Philipp Grosskurth
September 25, 2024
Spencer Feingold
September 25, 2024