Resilience, Peace and Security

Climate, migration, and conflict in a changing world

Libyan migrants on a wooden boat await rescue by the migrant search and rescue vessel MV Seefuchs of the German NGO Sea-Eye in the search and rescue zone some fifty nautical miles north of the Tunisian-Libyan land border, September 30, 2017. REUTERS/Darrin Zammit Lupi - RC1AED6D7160

Image: REUTERS/Darrin Zammit Lupi - RC1AED6D7160

Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Resilience, Peace and Security?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Migration is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:


This article is part of the World Economic Forum's Geostrategy platform.

Record levels of displacement and accelerating climate change have prompted many to wonder if the world is headed toward a more violent future.

Whether a policymaker, practitioner, diplomat, or peacebuilder, the nexus of climate change, migration, and conflict is posing fundamental challenges in myriad ways.

The Wilson Center’s study, Navigating Complexity: Climate, Migration, and Conflict in a Changing World, sets out to provide insights into these challenges and examine policy responses.

Climate change is expected to contribute to the movements of people through a variety of means.

At the same time, there is significant concern climate change may influence the form, type, and location of violent conflict.

Our understanding of these dynamics is evolving quickly and sometimes producing surprising results. There are, in fact, considerable misconceptions about why people move, how many move, and what effects they have.

While not exhaustive, the authors give a sense of the major lines of thinking and seek to help answer the following questions: What do we know (and not know) about the links between climate change, migration, and violent conflict? And what can be done to maximize the potential for constructive outcomes?

Interwoven factors

Experts generally agree that the risk of violent conflict or instability related to climate change-induced migration is highly dependent on local context. Climatic factors are very difficult to separate from other critical factors in decisions to move or engage in armed conflict. These economic, political, and social factors will always be key parts of any analysis of climate change, migration, and conflict.

Nevertheless, climate change and large movements of people clearly present major societal and governance challenges. Governments, international organizations, and civil society are being asked to respond, whether they are prepared or not.

The report provides a background scan of relevant literature and an in-depth analysis of the high-profile cases of Darfur and Syria to discern policy-relevant lessons.

The study offers five major takeaways:

1) Labels such as “climate refugees” are misleading, given the current underdevelopment of legal frameworks defining these terms, lack of formal protections or status, and multiple causes of human mobility.

2) Because the vast majority of migration and displacement occurs within national borders, strengthening local institutions, including customary institutions, and encouraging flexibility in resource rights may help enable the peaceful accommodation of new arrivals. The primacy of resource rights also suggests the principles of environmental peacebuilding can help reduce vulnerability in areas prone to climate problems.

3) Conflicts where climate change and displacement play substantial roles may begin at the communal level but can quickly expand beyond. Related peace processes will therefore likely need to be carried out at multiple spatial and political levels.

4) Movement in response to environmental change has a long history, and migration can be a successful and peaceful means of climate adaptation if enabled by smart policy. Although taking action is essential, simplistic analyses of climate’s impacts on migration, displacement, and conflict can prompt misdirected responses. Political, economic, and social contexts are as important to understanding vulnerability as exposure to the physical effects of climate change itself.

5) Some mechanisms for coping with climate change are tenuous and susceptible to policy change, as in the case of Darfur’s hakura land tenure system, which helped alleviate resource tensions before it was dismantled.

Indeed, climate change responses can contribute to the displacement of people and social conflict. “Do no harm” should be the operating principle—though not “do nothing,” as people will adjust to their situation, regardless of how prepared the policy environment is, potentially turning to destructive responses if faced with few other options.

Navigating Complexity: Climate, Migration, and Conflict in a Changing World, Schuyler Null and Lauren Herzer Risi, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars

Have you read?
Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Related topics:
Resilience, Peace and SecurityClimate Action
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

Why small island states need scaled finance and amplified action

Jorge Moreira da Silva

May 29, 2024

About Us



Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum