Geo-Economics and Politics

6 home truths for the new head of the WTO

Medical workers put on personal protective equipment before a mass coronavirus disease (COVID-19) swab test in Petaling Jaya, Malaysia October 21, 2020. REUTERS/Lim Huey Teng - RC2YMJ9CKP2T

The abundance of PPE in the end shows how trade can be a safety net. Image: REUTERS/Lim Huey Teng

Bernice Lee
Hoffmann Distinguished Fellow for Sustainability, Chatham House
Share:
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Geo-Economics and Politics?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Geopolitics is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

Geopolitics

  • Countries' readiness for greater international competition is a prerequisite for a more functional trading system.
  • Trade might make countries richer overall, but the benefits are unevenly spread.
  • Addressing the intersection of trade and environment, climate, gender, health, or development will safeguard any future trading system.

The race to be the next Director-General (DG) of the World Trade Organisation is now down to two candidates: Ngozi Okonjo Iweala of Nigeria, and Yoo Myung-hee of South Korea. Whoever prevails will face the reality as the global trade body chief. The DG has little power to strongarm governments into agreements, or to remould underlying power dynamics. But she can provide the mood music at a time when trade is not only weaponised but also a weapon of choice. A few home truths here might be helpful.

Have you read?

1. It’s not you, it's me

It has been argued that trade wars are the international manifestation of class wars at home. If that is the case, the stability of the trading system will hinge on whether countries are politically prepared when deepening economic liaisons with others. Trade aggravates weaknesses in society. Countries' own social readiness for greater international competition is a prerequisite for a more functional, less fractured trading system.

The WTO, with its focus on codifying and reducing specific market distortions, is not where trade-related social challenges are addressed. Trade rules are blunt instruments to manage complex national dynamics. Encouraging better use of policies and international vehicles to meet social needs is a must for the long-term health of the trading system.

While the path forward is not straightforward, the new DG can convene an honest, or at least factual, discussion on these thorny concerns, which have been articulated by poorer countries for years. Trade wars may be class wars but fighting trade wars will not win you class wars at home.

2. Trump a symptom not the cause

It is easy to blame President Donald Trump’s antipathy, Xi Jinping’s China and other alleged rule-breakers as the culprits derailing liberal trade multilateralism, but a reset was long overdue.

Trade as a share of global output is widely deemed to have peaked in 2008, precipitated by a changing technology landscape and costs in manufacturing centres. Labour-intensive supply chains were already reshaped by automation and machine intelligence before increased political scrutiny cast further doubt over trade-dependent development models.

The perceived botch in aligning China with the market economy model also preceded Trump. That integration and interdependence did not bring economic convergence has long spurred calls for de-globalization.

The system was due a revamp well before COVID forced a fundamental rethink over what goods are deemed “essential”.

An unprecedented output collapse occurred in the first half of 2020
An unprecedented output collapse occurred in the first half of 2020

3. Retire hackneyed, self-serving received wisdoms

Pious claims that “the multilateral trading system is a tide that lifts all boats” should be put to rest. No, it does not. It provides a shared framework for commercial exchange, but nations find themselves in vessels of varying capacity. Trade might make countries richer overall, but the benefits are unevenly spread. Extolling the benefits projected in general equilibrium models can sound like cheques in the post, especially when most politicians have spent decades ignoring rather than confronting distributive effects.

4. Hyperboles don’t sell, realism might

Neither lofty promises nor the doom and gloom of absolute de-globalization would get the multilateral trading system out of the current jam, but plainer speak might just help. Whether your supply chains are just-in-time or just-in-case, they would both benefit from a solid rule-based multilateral trading system.

Resilience has many faces; it is ultimately a country’s choice to pick one version over another. Over reliance on one supplier certainly shows the limits of the just-in-time global economy, but the rallying abundance of PPE in the end also shows how trade can be a safety net for the just-in-case economy. Unless governments recognize that trade is a hard-to-replicate provider of last resort, we could sleepwalk into a new normal without a net.

5. There is no way back to business-as-usual

Unlike with previous trade spats, today there is no clear path towards a functional new normal. The current stalemate means WTO members may have to keep returning to the drawing board while the bifurcated world forces them to take sides not only on trade but also technology choices. Fresh challenges also lie ahead over how best the WTO can respond to the seismic shifts in the role of the state given the scope and the size of rescue packages around the world.

The new DG will have the thankless task of helping break up fights before the point of no return, which will require an excellent political nose along with jedi-like manoeuvres.

Discover

What is the World Economic Forum doing on trade facilitation?

6. The so-called “trade and” agenda is the future trade agenda

The liberalization agenda has stalled in its momentum, but has it run its course? Some depict trade negotiations as boxing matches while belittling the need for compromises. Others decry the impacts of opened markets on the domestic poor. If even the champions turn their back on liberalization as a goal in and of itself, what instead will be the driving rationale?

For years the WTO has flirted with so-called “trade and” agendas, whether trade and environment, climate, gender, health, or development. Now is the time to recognize that addressing the intersection of trade with these other areas of public policy should not only be near the top of the WTO's to-do list. It is the to-do list that would safeguard any future multilateral trading system.

Even if multilateral diplomacy delivers more promised goods, the transaction costs incurred will continue to draw attention. But then how palatable are the alternatives, really? Statement diplomacy over the past few years through plurilateral initiatives did not plug the gap, while also ridden with transaction costs, coupled with the whiff of irrelevance.

Finally, the WTO led by the new DG must acknowledge that there is no technical solution to the free-rider problem because punitive measures on trading partners will likely ricochet. The political cost of accepting free riding has gone up, not down, over the past two decades. Multilateralism in an interdependent world means that winners may not feel particularly victorious, but it also means that they won’t lose.

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Related topics:
Geo-Economics and PoliticsTrade and InvestmentSustainable DevelopmentHealth and Healthcare Systems
Share:
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

World Bank says global economy stabilizing and other economics stories to read

Joe Myers

June 14, 2024

About Us

Events

Media

Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum