Global Cooperation

Towards a global consensus based on economic justice and shared prosperity

Children practice social distancing while the spread of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) continues, in an informal settlement in Cape Town, South Africa, April 17, 2020. REUTERS/Sumaya Hisham - RC2F6G9EB0G8

What did John Williamson mean by the 'Washington Consensus' – and where do we go from here? Image: REUTERS/Sumaya Hisham

Trudi Makhaya
Economic Adviser to the President, The Presidency of South Africa
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Global Cooperation?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Geo-economics is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:


Listen to the article

  • Economist John Williamson, who coined the term "Washington Consensus," passed away in April 2021 at 83.
  • Economic debates in post-apartheid South Africa were shaped by Williamson's ideas.
  • As inequality continues to rise and we grapple with how to build back better from the pandemic, we can look to South Africa for a new global consensus premised on economic justice and shared prosperity.

Two years before assuming office as the first president of a democratic South Africa, speaking at the 1992 World Economic Forum Annual Meeting in Davos, Nelson Mandela called for “a global offensive for development, prosperity and human survival.” In laying out his vision for an imminent post-apartheid economy, he spoke in terms that would have appealed to the orthodoxy of the time. The new regime would usher in a mixed economy with ambitions to raise the levels of investment and productivity.

As we mark the passing of economist John Williamson – who coined the term “Washington Consensus” – it is worth reflecting on a new society that came into being in a time shaped by popular notions of what Williamson meant. South African economic debates were shaped by – and continue to make reference to – that set of ideas.

John Williamson, the World Bank chief economist for South Asia, addresses the South Asian Forex Dealers' Congress at a hotel in Sri Lanka's capital Colombo November 13. Williamson said that South Asia can learn lessons from recent economic turmoil in East Asia, but that it should be done selectively .SRILANKA - RP1DRIDMGKAA
Remembering John Williamson, 1937-2021 Image: REUTERS

What is the Washington Consensus?

In his seminal paper published in 1990, Williamson had Latin America in mind. His aim was to outline a “desirable set of economic policy reforms” to deal with the debt crisis playing out in that region at the time.

Williamson presented a set of 10 policy instruments, which quickly came to be treated as commandments in certain quarters:

  • small budget deficits
  • fiscal expenditure motivated by economic and not political returns
  • lower taxes over a broader tax base
  • financial liberalisation
  • a competitive exchange rate
  • trade liberalisation
  • promoting foreign direct investment (FDI)
  • privatisation of state enterprises
  • pro-competitive regulatory reform
  • secure property rights

But this was not meant to be an economic recipe to be followed slavishly, as Williamson argued in later years.

There are two ways that the Washington Consensus has come to be understood, Williamson wrote in The Strange History of the Washington Consensus, published in 2004.

In one variant of interpretation, the consensus is shorthand for the policies of the Bretton Woods institutions as they advocated for economic reform across the world.

Have you read?

However, there are distinctions between Williamson’s list and the policy advice dished out by these bodies. Notably, Williamson argued for the liberalisation of FDI, not the liberalisation of short-term financial flows or of outflows. On the subject of exchange rates, the international financial institutions tended towards directing countries to make a clear choice between a “pure” floating exchange rate or one fixed to a peg, whereas Williamson wanted currencies to be actively managed towards a competitive level. Finally, the Bretton Woods bodies paid far greater attention to institutions and governance, whereas Williamson did not.

The other way to understand the Washington Consensus is to conflate it with neoliberalism or market fundamentalism: “This I regard as a thoroughly objectionable perversion of the original meaning,” Williamson wrote in 2004.

The Washington Consensus and post-apartheid South Africa

In South Africa, the ANC-led government removed tariff barriers rapidly, removed state involvement and price regulation in markets such as agriculture, removed industrial subsidies in apartheid era industrial parks and steadily liberalised capital flows. But this was a policy mix attuned to the need to dismantle racial inequality, to protect labour rights and to tackle market concentration and uncompetitive behaviour. A progressive taxation regime was introduced to extend social protection to the Black poor, who had been largely excluded from the generous welfare state once reserved for whites only. The post-apartheid economic policy orientation was inspired by the ethos of Ubuntu, which holds that we realise our humanity through upholding the humanity of others. In this worldview, the state has an obligation to deploy all means to promote an inclusive economy based on shared prosperity.

For white-owned business, led by conglomerates that had grown wealthy and powerful under apartheid, the agenda of liberalisation and market discipline became a rallying cry. Anxious about property rights and rearing to invest in global markets, business cloaked itself in the narrative of liberalisation, privatisation and deregulation. The support that the apartheid state had provided to interests in mining, agriculture, energy and basic industry – for example, through suppression of Black wages and lavish industrial subsidies – was quickly forgotten.

Nelson Mandela and Klaus Schwab World Economic Forum Davos 1992
Nelson Mandela and Klaus Schwab in Davos in 1992 Image: World Economic Forum

The left, including trade unions allied with the ANC, accused the government of following the Washington Consensus (a la commandments) too closely. In this view, the government was proceeding in a manner that did not support the aims of the liberation struggle nor address the terrifying economic realities on the ground.

Economic outcomes in the early years were encouraging. The three prominent global credit rating agencies all had South Africa on investment grade by 2007. A strong global economy, a commodity boom anchored by China, the rise of the Black South African consumer and increasing stature as continental champion drove this early success.

Yet as the commodity market cooled and financial crisis marred the global economy, the limits of that early success became clear. Unemployment remained high, poverty edged up again and the level of inequality is one of the highest in the world. Even though South Africa was never a case study of the Washington Consensus, as popularly understood, there is a greater appreciation of those very things Williamson sought to add to his agenda in later years, such as the importance of institutions and the insight that “that the objective of economic policy should not be formulated as just increasing the growth rate…but that governments should also recognize that it matters profoundly who gets an increase in income.”

A new global consensus born in South Africa

Around the globe, inequality has risen. The case for deregulation and globalisation is fiercely contested. The ills of deindustrialisation are not only felt in communities in Johannesburg, but have also taken their toll in the American Rust Belt and old industrial Britain.

Indeed, as the world grapples with how to build back better, the Economic Reconstruction and Recovery Plan announced by President Cyril Ramaphosa aims for the structural transformation of the economy towards a digitally enabled, progressively greener economy with deeper linkages to its home continent and the rest of the globe. A key pillar of this agenda is the (re)building of the institutional capabilities of the state and the development of know-how across society to support that economic transformation. Measures to tackle the economic exclusion of those who have been kept on the margins of the economy – women, youth, Black people – form a key feature of reconstruction efforts.

In its economic policy strivings, South Africa, a microcosm of the world, holds the seeds for an Ubuntu-inspired global consensus premised on economic justice and shared prosperity.

The author is a member of the World Economic Forum Expert Network.

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Related topics:
Global CooperationGeo-Economics and PoliticsEconomic Growth
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

Critical minerals are in demand. How do we make sure this trend drives development? 

Kimberley Botwright and Guillaume Dabré

May 24, 2024

About Us



Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum