- A Yale study has helped illuminate how people make food choices.
- Their study involved assessing how fruit flies decide which foods to eat, whether they prioritized the calorie intake or the taste.
- They found the hungrier the flies were, the more likely they will tolerate bitter taste to obtain more calories.
- The sense of reward in both a fly’s brain and a human’s brain are regulated by the same system.
- Neurochemistry may sometimes dictate food choices humans think they are making consciously.
Flies have discriminating taste. Like a gourmet perusing a menu, they spend much of their time seeking sweet nutritious calories and avoiding bitter, potentially toxic food. But what happens in their brains when they make these food choices?
Yale researchers discovered an interesting way to find out. They tricked them.
In a study that could also help illuminate how people make food choices, the researchers gave hungry fruit flies the choice between sweet, nutritious food laced with bitter quinine and a less sweet, but not bitter, food containing fewer calories. Then, using neuroimaging, they tracked neural activity in their brains as they made these tough choices.
So which won? Calories or better taste?
“It depends on how hungry they are,” said Michael Nitabach, professor of cellular and molecular physiology, genetics, and neuroscience at Yale School of Medicine and senior author of the study. “The hungrier they are, the more likely they will tolerate bitter taste to obtain more calories.”
But the real answer to how flies make these decisions is a little more complex, according to the study published July 5 in the journal Nature Communications.
According to the research team, led by Preeti Sareen, associate research scientist at Yale, flies relay sensory information to a portion of their brain called the fan-shaped body, where signals are integrated, triggering what amounts to the insect version of an executive decision. The researchers found that patterns of neuronal activity in the fan-shaped body change adaptively when novel food choices are introduced, which dictates the fly’s decision over what food to eat.
But researchers went a step further. And things got even stranger. They found they could change a fly’s choice by manipulating neurons in areas of the brain that feed into the fan-shaped body. For example, when they caused a decrease in activity in the neurons involved in metabolism, they found that it made hungry flies choose the lower calorie food.
“It is one big feedback loop, not just top-down decision making,” Nitabach said.
What is the World Economic Forum doing to help ensure global food security?
Two billion people in the world currently suffer from malnutrition and according to some estimates, we need 60% more food to feed the global population by 2050. Yet the agricultural sector is ill-equipped to meet this demand: 700 million of its workers currently live in poverty, and it is already responsible for 70% of the world’s water consumption and 30% of global greenhouse gas emissions.
New technologies could help our food systems become more sustainable and efficient, but unfortunately the agricultural sector has fallen behind other sectors in terms of technology adoption.
Launched in 2018, the Forum’s Innovation with a Purpose Platform is a large-scale partnership that facilitates the adoption of new technologies and other innovations to transform the way we produce, distribute and consume our food.
With research, increasing investments in new agriculture technologies and the integration of local and regional initiatives aimed at enhancing food security, the platform is working with over 50 partner institutions and 1,000 leaders around the world to leverage emerging technologies to make our food systems more sustainable, inclusive and efficient.
And this is where there are connections to food choices of humans, he said. Neural activity in both a fly’s brain and a human’s brain are regulated by the secretion of neuropeptides and the neurotransmitter dopamine, which in humans helps regulate sensations of reward. Changes in this network may alter how the brain responds to different types of food. In other words, neurochemistry may sometimes dictate food choices we think we are making consciously.
“The study provides a template to understand how it is that things like hunger and internal emotional states influence our behavior,” Nitabach said.
Sareen and Li Yan McCurdy, a graduate student at Yale School of Medicine, are co-authors of the paper.