Globalization is at a crossroads of four possible trajectories. Image: Unsplash/CHUTTERSNAP
Explore and monitor how Economic Progress is affecting economies, industries and global issues
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:
Listen to the article
- Globalization has created significant economic opportunities and lifted millions out of poverty, but has also resulted in inequality and economic disruption.
- The evolution of globalization is even more uncertain considering the economic impact of the pandemic, global warming and the unsettled geopolitical climate.
- The World Economic Forum has explored four scenarios for the global economy that waver between nationalism and multilateralism across the political and digital spheres.
- It is likely that we will see a mix of these trends over the next few years.
What does the future hold for globalization?
There is little debate that globalization has created significant economic opportunities and lifted millions out of poverty. But its focus on growth and competitiveness has also been criticized as a source of inequality and economic disruption.
Add to this the fundamental economic transformation the world has undergone since the pandemic began, the ongoing climate crisis and renewed geopolitical turbulence, and it’s clear that globalization is at a crossroads.
Have you read?
Four future trajectories for economic globalization
A new white paper from the World Economic Forum’s Centre for the New Economy and Society takes a look at what our global economic future might look like. Four Futures for Economic Globalization: Scenarios and Their Implications puts forward four possible trajectories for the evolution of globalization by 2027.
It considers how globalization may evolve as economic powers choose between multilateral integration and fragmentation, both at a political level and in their technology policies.
Scenario 1: Bringing the world back together in physical and virtual unity
The first trajectory, “Globalization 5.0: Reconnection”, builds on the ideal of shared prosperity. It envisages increased integration in both economic and technology terms.
Reinforced regional and global alliances will result in diversified supply chains, high labour mobility, greater employment flexibility and increased innovation.
There will also be greater adoption of renewable energy and investments in long-term sustainable growth, shared more equitably across advanced and developing economies.
These trends will be underpinned by strong local economic and social resilience, including greater investments in social safety nets through higher taxation.
Scenario 2: Fragmenting the internet
In the “Analogue Networks: Virtual Nationalism” scenario, physical integration between countries is revived. Governments see the benefits of multilateralism in terms of affordable fuel, food and other goods.
However, this sentiment is not replicated on a digital level. Exacerbated political rivalries and cybersecurity concerns lead countries to seek greater control over the digital domain. This will result in a splintering of technology regulation, governance and interoperability. Instead of the global internet, there will be several “splinternets”, hampering digital financial services and international trade.
Technology innovation, labour mobility and the energy transition are expected to stagnate under this globalization scenario. Developing economies will suffer disproportionately due to their lack of advanced digital capabilities.
Scenario 3: Virtual integration
The “Digital Dominance: Agile Platforms” scenario considers the opposite of the previous scenario – what will happen if digital integration prevails as international cooperation goes into reverse?
The likely outcome will be greater economic protectionism with highly localized manufacturing and value chains at the mercy of political rivalries.
However, alongside this, major economies are predicted to align on the taxation and governance of digital services. This will lead to a surge in technology-enabled work and cooperation, offsetting some of the impact of physical fragmentation.
How is the World Economic Forum fostering a sustainable and inclusive digital economy?
Despite booming demand for highly skilled workers, their cross-border movement could face restrictions depending on where they are based, creating a two-speed labour market. The energy transition would likely suffer as protectionist measures limit access to natural resources and raw materials.
Scenario 4: A doubly fragmented world
Geopolitical turbulence and the impact of COVID-19 have turned countries’ attention inwards. In the fourth scenario, “Autarkic World: Systemic Fragmentation”, that focus becomes permanent, resulting in protectionist measures that slow trade, investment and cross-border job opportunities.
Cooperation and supply chains become regionalized or localized, while a degradation of manufacturing and repeated supply shocks threaten food and health security.
In the digital sphere, governments exert greater control, resulting in increased censorship and surveillance, as well as misinformation.
The overall impact is wide-ranging economic stagnation. The environment would suffer in the face of declining international cooperation and standards, and a rise in fossil fuel use would be likely.
No ideal case scenario
None of the scenarios represents an ideal set-up for the future of the global economy, the report’s authors conclude.
They see the most likely future as being one where global cooperation and economic nationalism coexist across the physical and digital worlds. They recommend overcoming an outdated globalization narrative and focusing on a fresh approach centred on social and environmental outcomes.
The Annual Meeting of the World Economic Forum will discuss the future of globalization in a session called “Is Globalization Dead?” on 25 May.
Don't miss any update on this topic
Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.
License and Republishing
The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.
More on Davos AgendaSee all
March 1, 2024
February 28, 2024
Mattie Rodrigue and Diva Amon
February 23, 2024
February 22, 2024
Pasquale Frega and Katrine Luise DiBona
February 21, 2024
Ameya Hadap, Thibault Villien De Gabiole and Laia Barbarà
February 20, 2024