Geographies in Depth

The African Union wants to create its own credit rating agency. Here's why

The African Union plans to create a new sovereign credit rating agency.

The African Union plans to create a new sovereign credit rating agency. Image: REUTERS/Tiksa Negeri

Spencer Feingold
Digital Editor, World Economic Forum Geneva
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Geographies in Depth?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Financial and Monetary Systems is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

Financial and Monetary Systems

Listen to the article

  • Sovereign credit rating scores can have a major impact on the flow of capital and the cost of borrowing for governments.
  • Access to capital is especially important for developing countries.
  • An independent credit rating agency in Africa could better assess economic indicators and credit risk across the region, proponents say.

The African Union plans to create a new sovereign credit rating agency that it says could provide more accurate risk assessments for governments across the continent.

The proposal for the new agency, the African Credit Rating Agency (ACRA), was outlined in a recent report by the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa, which claimed that today’s leading credit rating firms make “significant errors in their ratings.” The erroneous ratings, according to the report, are often based on narrow assessments that don’t take into account positive economic indicators and can impact the flow to capital in the region.

“It is envisaged that the ACRA would provide balanced and comprehensive opinions on African credit instruments to support affordable access to capital and the development of domestic financial markets,” the report states.

Sovereign credit ratings

Sovereign credit ratings, which are independent judgements on a government’s creditworthiness, are particularly important for developing countries since the cost of borrowing can influence a government’s ability to fund everything from infrastructure programmes to healthcare services.

Rating agencies take a number of factors into account when assessing the level of risk associated with lending money to a government. These indicators include the level of government debt, per capita income, GDP growth, the stability of financial institutions, inflation and default history, among others.

We need to foster agency for African people to meet development aspirations and a system where risk can be fairly priced

Ahunna Eziakonwa, UN Assistant-Secretary General

Today, three agencies are considered to be the most significant: Fitch Ratings, Moody’s Services and S&P Global Ratings. Rating scales differ between firms, but the top three agencies use alphabetical scales with AAA being the top level and C or D being the lowest. Pluses, minuses and numbers are also used to denote sub levels of creditworthiness.

African Credit Rating Agency

The United Nations Economic Commission for Africa report found that in the first half of 2023, the top rating agencies issued 13 negative decisions to 11 African countries. The negative assessments included rating downgrades and negative outlook analyses.

“These developments have reversed the optimism amongst investors on the international financial markets that African countries are recovering from the devastating Covid-19 economic shocks,” the report states.

In January, for instance, one of the leading credit rating agencies downgraded the Nigerian government’s rating from B3 to Caa1. The decision, the agency said, was due to “wide-ranging fiscal” pressures and “institutional weaknesses and social challenges” in the country.

Nigeria, however, disputed the decision, which caused the value of Nigerian government bonds to fall.

“In the view of the Federal Government of Nigeria, by proceeding to downgrade the government’s rating after rigorous engagements on all the efforts the government has undertaken to stabilise the economy, confirms that the rating agency lacks the full appreciation of the country’s domestic environment in the context of the international political economy,” the UN report noted.

People queue at an ATM, as authorities try to limit the spread of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Abuja, Nigeria March 30, 2020.
People queue at an ATM in Abuja, Nigeria. Image: REUTERS/Afolabi Sotunde

The ACRA, which is expected to be launched in 2024, could provide more precise credit ratings and economic outlook assessments that would make borrowing cheaper for African governments, proponents say.

In April, a study by the United Nations Development Programme found that African countries could save nearly $75 billion if credit ratings were based on less subjective assessments. The savings would enable governments to “repay the principal of their domestic and foreign debt and free up funds for investments in human capital and infrastructure development,” the report states.

The creation of an African credit rating agency was also raised during a gathering of African ministers and development actors during the 2023 World Bank/IMF Spring Meetings.

“We are at the heart of polycrisis and African governments are struggling with a drought in development financing,” Ahunna Eziakonwa, UN Assistant-Secretary General and UNDP Regional Director for Africa, said in a statement. “We urgently need more fairness and justice in the way we conceptualize multilateral agencies. We need to foster agency for African people to meet development aspirations and a system where risk can be fairly priced.”

Have you read?
Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Related topics:
Geographies in DepthFinancial and Monetary Systems
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

China has an electric vehicle advantage but can it maintain its edge?

Shiv Shivaraman

June 17, 2024

About Us



Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum