Nature and Biodiversity

Wild animals can help us capture and store carbon. Here’s how

Protecting and restoring wild animals can boost natural carbon storage, according to a paper published in Nature magazine.

Protecting and restoring wild animals can boost natural carbon storage, according to a paper published in Nature magazine. Image: Unsplash/bonopeppers

Andrea Willige
Senior Writer, Forum Agenda
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Nature and Biodiversity?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Nature and Biodiversity is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

Nature and Biodiversity

This article is part of: Centre for Nature and Climate
  • Declining biodiversity and collapsing ecosystems are among the biggest perceived global risks over the next decade.
  • Protecting and restoring wild animals can boost natural carbon storage, according to a paper published in Nature magazine.
  • Wildebeest, wolves, elephants, sharks and whales are among those species whose natural functions contribute to carbon sequestration.
  • By rewilding these species, over six gigatonnes of CO2 per year could be taken out of the atmosphere.

The ocean, soil and forests are the world’s largest natural carbon sinks. Maintaining and enhancing them is a priority when it comes to halting climate change. However, the importance of wild animals for the carbon cycle may have been underestimated – until now.

Figure showing the global risks ranked by severity over the short and long term.
Fears about the decline of biodiversity over the next decade are growing. Image: World Economic Forum

Animals boost carbon storage

Alongside transitioning to renewable energies and preventing a further loss of ecosystems that store CO2, natural climate solutions are held up as cost-effective and sustainable ways of capturing excess CO2. These approaches include protecting and restoring natural ecosystems such as forests, wetlands and coastal areas.

However, even with all these measures working at their best, there will be a shortfall. The authors argue that putting more emphasis on protecting certain animals – like terrestrial and marine mammals and marine fish – could boost carbon storage to fill this gap.

The paper points to research in the tropical rainforest that showed how a greater diversity of animals with medium-to-large bodies and various functional roles can significantly increase carbon absorption. Among the functional roles wild animals fulfil are dispersing the seeds of trees with carbon-dense wood, enhancing the nutrient supply of the soil and controlling the competition between different plants.

Table showing the estimated animal effects on net ecosystem carbon storage.
An extra 6.41 gigatonnes of CO2 per year could be taken out of the atmosphere by protecting certain species. Image: Nature

Rewilding as a cost-effective solution

When the wildebeest population in Africa dropped dramatically in the wake of a rinderpest epidemic that had transferred from domestic cattle, there were too few animals to fully graze the Serengeti on their migration. With more grass left, the incidence of wildfires increased, releasing large amounts of CO2.

Have you read?

The paper therefore argues that animal conservation must be put into the service of carbon capture and storage more actively.

Animals need to be protected and restored to achieve numbers that enable them to play their functional roles and their part in the carbon cycle effectively. This is also known as “trophic rewilding”.

Between protecting and restoring relevant species – including wildebeest, sea otters, some shark species, elephants, bison and Baleen whales – an extra 6.41 gigatonnes of CO2 per year could be taken out of the atmosphere, the authors say.

global distribution candidate animal species and ecosystem carbon cycle capture storage
Rewilding species to perform their function in the carbon cycle. Image: Nature

More research is needed into the climate effects of trophic rewilding

While a cost-effective and sustainable approach, extending nature-based solutions to include wild animals is not without its challenges. The authors note that the interactions between these species and both the natural and the human environment need to be weighed up. Grey wolves can have a positive impact on CO2 sequestration in forests, but can badly affect grasslands. Similarly, rewilding large herbivores may positively affect CO2 but release additional methane.


What is the World Economic Forum doing about nature?

The paper’s authors recommend further research, but not at the risk of missing the opportunities associated with trophic rewilding.

The World Economic Forum actively supports the maintenance and restoration of biodiversity through schemes such as the Biodiversity Finance Initiative. It aims to remove barriers to investor action to help mobilize the estimated average of $844 billion required every year over the next decade to promote biodiversity. Biodiversity finance is trailing climate finance with teething problems such as risk identification and measurement, standardized disclosure and reporting protocols and product design still to be resolved.

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Related topics:
Nature and BiodiversityClimate and Nature
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

The people’s choice: Stunning images from the Wildlife Photographer of the Year 2023

Meg Jones

February 22, 2024

About Us



Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum