Plastic bag bans in the US reduced plastic bag use by billions, study finds
Plastic bag bans worldwide significantly reduce plastic bag use, with some areas seeing billions less used yearly. Image: Mathias Reding on Unsplash
Paige Bennett
Writer, EcoWatchGet involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:
Future of the Environment
- Plastic bag bans encourage reusable bag use and raise public awareness about plastic pollution.
- Phasing out bags requires caution, as bans can place an undue burden on unprepared businesses and consumers.
- Effective bans often combine legislation with public education and support for alternatives.
A new report from nonprofits Environment America, U.S. Public Interest Research Group Education Fund and Frontier Group has found that bans on plastic bags around the U.S. have already reduced the number of bags used by billions.
The report, “Plastic Bag Bans Work”, found that bans in three states — New Jersey, Philadelphia and Vermont — and two cities, Portland, Oregon and Santa Barbara, California, have reduced the number of single-use plastic bags used each year by around 6 billion. According to Environment America, the number of bags saved could go around the planet 42 times.
Further, the findings suggested that plastic bag bans could cut single-use plastic bag use by around 300 bags per person each year once adopted.
According to the report, over 500 municipalities in 28 states had plastic bag legislation in effect as of 2021. Additionally, 12 states have single-use plastic bag bans: California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington. State-wide bans in Colorado and Rhode Island just went into effect at the start of 2024.
What is the World Economic Forum doing about plastic pollution?
“The bottom line is that plastic bag bans work,” Faran Savitz, a zero-waste advocate with the PennEnvironment Research & Policy Center, said in a statement. “Millions of Pennsylvanians have realized that it’s easy to live without plastic bags and get used to bringing a bag from home or skipping a bag when they can. That means less waste and less litter. For our children to inherit a less polluted earth, that’s exactly what we need.”
But the report did outline some grievances, including that companies have used loopholes, replacing thin, single-use plastic bags with thicker plastic bags labeled as recyclable in some places with legislation that allows replacing bags with thicker, recyclable (but still plastic) bags. For instance, the report noted that California banned plastic bags in 2016, while still allowing thick, recyclable plastic bags for a 10-cent fee. Following this legislation, the weight of plastic bags used and thrown out per person increased.
Some areas have also swapped the plastic bags for paper, which are still single-use bags, with or without a fee. When charged a minimum 10-cent-per-bag fee, shoppers in Mountain View, California saw a decline in paper bag usage. But shoppers in Philadelphia used paper bags at a 157% increased rate amid the plastic bag ban when paper bags were available for use with no fee.
“The intent of these laws isn’t to shift from a single-use bag to another single-use bag,” Celeste Meiffren-Swango, a co-author of the report and a campaign director for Environment America Research and Policy Center, told Grist. “Paper has its own environmental impact.”
As such, the report authors concluded that policymakers should implement well-designed plastic bag bans that do not promote use of any single-use plastic bags, including ones labeled as recyclable, as well as charging a fee for the use of paper bags to instead encourage the use of reusable bags.
Shoppers who live in areas with existing bans can calculate the impact of their local plastic bag bans with the Bag Savings Calculator by Environment America.
Don't miss any update on this topic
Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.
License and Republishing
World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.
The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.
The Agenda Weekly
A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda
You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.
More on Nature and BiodiversitySee all
Kirsten Schuijt and Maria Susana Muhamad González
October 11, 2024
Douglas Broom
October 11, 2024
Johnny Wood and Madeleine North
October 3, 2024
Andreas Obrecht and Akanksha Khatri
September 25, 2024
Gill Einhorn and Rosie Ponting
September 25, 2024