Trade Is Best Tool to Fight Poverty and Promote Growth

19 Jan 2017

Fon Mathuros, Head of Media, World Economic Forum: Tel.: +41 (0)79 201 0211; E-mail:

· Business leaders and policy-makers are concerned about rising populism and protectionism

· Ultimately globalization will prevail, but there will be fits and starts

· China is taking the lead in extolling the virtues of free trade

· For more information on the Annual Meeting, see

· Follow the World Economic Forum on all digital platforms:

19 January 2017, Davos-Klosters, Switzerland – Leaders from business and policy-making are not expecting a return to 1930s-style trade war, despite the populist backlash in parts of the world against globalization and free trade. Nevertheless, the reality is that nationalism and protectionism are on the rise globally and the case for globalization needs to be made, agreed panellists in a session at the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting.

“There is no winner in a trade war,” stressed Min Zhu, President, National Institute of Financial Research, People's Republic of China. Indeed, raising tariff barriers on both sides would cut China’s annual GDP by around one-third and US GDP by one-half. Rhetoric coming out of the incoming US administration is concerning, he added. “China will continue to support globalization and is willing to work with all countries,” he said.

“Protectionism is rising and that is worrying,” said Cecilia Malmström, Commissioner for Trade at the European Commission, Brussels. Trade is the best tool we have to fight poverty and promote growth. “However trade needs to be more inclusive, transparent and values-based,” she added.

David M. Cote, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Honeywell International, stressed the need to learn the lessons of history. “Since the Phoenicians, we’ve known that trade between countries raises the standard of living,” he said. We just need to find a way to make it work, he added. He said it is important not to take political rhetoric at face value and, instead, suggests a wait-and-see approach.

David Abney, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, UPS, USA, also does not foresee a trade war. With so much to lose, cooler heads will prevail, he said. “Trade is not a zero-sum game,” he added. Nevertheless, leaders have not done a good enough job communicating the aggregate benefit of open trade and globalization. “We need to do much more to equip displaced workers with new jobs and 21st-century skills,” he said.

“We should not talk ourselves into a trade war,” stressed Roberto Azevêdo, Director-General of the World Trade Organization (WTO), Geneva. He emphasized the need to deliver positive news on trade. Periodically, we must deliver important breakthroughs, he said, such as the Bali 2013 Trade Facilitation Agreement, which increased global exports by around $1.3 trillion.

The 47th World Economic Forum Annual Meeting is taking place on 17-20 January in Davos-Klosters, Switzerland, under the theme Responsive and Responsible Leadership. More than 3,000 participants from nearly 100 countries are participating in over 400 sessions.

Notes to editors:

Read our blogs:

Watch Annual Meeting sessions:

Access our photo archive:

Become a Facebook fan:

Follow us on Twitter: and (hashtag #WEF)

Follow us on Weibo:

Find us on WeChat: davos_wef

All opinions expressed are those of the author. The World Economic Forum Blog is an independent and neutral platform dedicated to generating debate around the key topics that shape global, regional and industry agendas.

About Us



Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum