Economic Growth

Do new development goals risk failure without clearer targets?

Magda Mis
Production Editor, Thomson Reuters Foundation
Share:
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Economic Growth?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Economic Progress is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

Economic Progress

U.N. development goals for 2030 risk failure without clearer, more measurable targets that are based on the latest scientific evidence, researchers warned on Thursday.

World leaders are due to adopt later this year a set of new development objectives, such as ending hunger, promoting healthy lives and tackling climate change, to replace eight expiring U.N. Millennium Development Goals.

However, the 169 targets – related to 17 draft Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) – rely too much on vague language and would be more effective if set against numerical indicators, the scientists said in a report.

“Having robust targets that are clearly specified is key for the monitoring,” said Anne-Sophie Stevance, lead coordinator of the report by the International Council for Science and the International Social Science Council.

The study said only a third of the targets was well defined and based on latest scientific evidence, while more than half needed more work and 17 percent were weak or unneccessary.

“For example, there is a target on enhanced policy coherence for sustainable development, which is an important element to have in the SDG framework as a principle and overarching goal, but it doesn’t constitute a clear target that can be measured and followed in its implementation,” Stevance said.

The scientists said they were concerned some goals would have unintended negative consequences on others if they were pursued separately.

“The goals on climate change have a lot of reinforcing impact for achieving the goal on ending poverty,” Stevance told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

“But there are also potential negative consequences between goals. One example is the goal on food security and agriculture that clearly needs to be linked with water efficiency, sanitation and water quality.”

This article is published in collaboration with Thomson Reuters Foundation. Publication does not imply endorsement of views by the World Economic Forum.

To keep up with the Agenda subscribe to our weekly newsletter.

Author: Magda Mis is a Production Editor for Thomson Reuters Forundation

Image: Five-year-old Nasreen rests with her family’s belongings as she plays under a flyover in Mumbai, India, Jan. 19, 2015. REUTERS/Danish Siddiqui

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Share:
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

The latest on the US economy, and other economics stories to read

Joe Myers

April 26, 2024

About Us

Events

Media

Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum