Future of Work

This is the strange paradox that stops women from applying for jobs

A student attends a job interview during a job fair at Donghua University in Shanghai November 20, 2014. China's economy faces increasing downward pressure in 2015 while the country pushes forward reforms to keep economic growth stable, the top economic planning body said on Wednesday. REUTERS/Carlos Barria (CHINA - Tags: POLITICS BUSINESS) - GM1EABK1RYO01

Women were 16% less likely to apply for a job they had viewed Image: REUTERS/Carlos Barria

Cassie Werber
Writer, Quartz Africa
Share:
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Future of Work?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Future of Work is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

Future of Work

To what extent does a person’s gender explain the way they seek employment? A large dataset released today by LinkedIn suggests there are some differences, and some of the most interesting ones are in the likelihood men and women will apply and get hired.

The networking site found that men and women viewed about the same number of jobs as one another, but women were 16% less likely to apply for a job they had viewed. There are two ways to interpret this. One is that women could be less confident and therefore more easily put off by requirement-heavy ads. (Other research has shown women tend to apply to jobs only if they fulfill most of the stated criteria, while men are more likely to apply even when they don’t neatly fit the candidate profile.)

The second interpretation is that the women are being more selective, applying for jobs for which they are particularly suited or about which they’re most passionate. Another data point from the LinkedIn research seems to bear that out: When women did apply for jobs, the data showed, they were 16% more likely than the men to be hired.

LinkedIn analyzed interactions on its platform for the full year of 2018, an exercise that generated billions of data points from the platform’s 610 million members, spread across more than 200 countries.

Image: LinkedIn

Other behaviors also differed by gender. In a separate test, LinkedIn asked 450 members to highlight parts of a job description that they found important or interesting. When the researchers screened the results for gender, they found that women were more likely to concentrate on salary and benefits, with 68% highlighting those sections, as opposed to 58% of the men who were asked. In advice to companies seeking to recruit, LinkedIn suggested that information about “flexible working policies, parental leave, or healthcare is more significant for women,” and should be included in job postings if firms are serious about gender equality.

Have you read?

When it came to asking for endorsements, men were more likely to do so. LinkedIn has a function that lets members ask for a job referral if they have a connection to someone at the company doing the hiring. Men were 26% more likely than women to ask for a referral using that mechanism.

Finally, the research showed an interesting skew in how recruiters use the platform. Once they had viewed a profile, recruiters were just as likely to send that person an email, regardless of whether the potential hire was a man or a woman. But they were 13% less likely to look at a woman’s profile in the first place.

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Related topics:
Future of WorkGender InequalityEducation
Share:
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

From 'Quit-Tok' to proximity bias, here are 11 buzzwords from the world of hybrid work

Kate Whiting

April 17, 2024

3:12

About Us

Events

Media

Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum