Climate Action

Here’s how human efforts to reduce Mississippi floods have helped climate change

A boat floats down the Mississippi river.

More organic material is reaching the open due to human efforts to tame the Mississippi River. Image: Unsplash/Justin Wilkens

Barri Bronston-Tulane
Writer, Futurity
Share:
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Climate Action?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how United States is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

United States

  • A new study suggests human efforts to prevent the Mississippi River from flooding have resulted in less organic carbon lost to the atmosphere.
  • The yearly difference is predicted to be around 2.5 billion pounds over the past century.
  • These findings could have implications for the global carbon cycle and be applied to other large rivers around the world.

Human efforts to tame the Mississippi River may have had an unintended positive effect, according to a new study: more rapid transport of carbon to the ocean.

The researchers set out to learn more about the fate of organic carbon that the Mississippi River transports in large quantities. Organic carbon mainly derives from plant remains, soils, and rocks throughout the drainage basin of the Mississippi River that covers about 40% of the United States.

“We estimate that over the past century, the amount of organic carbon lost to the atmosphere during Mississippi River transport to the Gulf of Mexico has been reduced by at least 2.5 billion pounds (over one million metric tonnes) per year,” says coauthor Torbjörn Törnqvist, professor in the earth and environmental sciences department at Tulane University.

Have you read?

The researchers measured not only the age of carbon that has accumulated in Mississippi Delta sediments, but also the time of deposition of the sediment itself. They found that around 1,000 years ago, the carbon was generally more than 5,000 years older than the sediment in which it occurred. In historic time it is less than 3,000 years older.

“This shows that during prehistoric times, organic carbon took a much longer time to make it down to the mouth of the river, and a lot of it was lost along the way,” Törnqvist says.

“The main reason that this has dramatically changed is that we have built levees, which prevents flooding and the dispersal of organic matter onto the vast floodplain where much of it would degrade and return back into the atmosphere.”

The question is whether this also means that carbon is now buried at higher rates in the Gulf of Mexico than in the past. In February 2020, Törnqvist participated in an oceanographic cruise off the Louisiana coast which aimed to better understand what happens with organic carbon from the Mississippi River once it enters the ocean. Results from this expedition are expected in coming years.

The study, published in AGU Advances, has potential implications for the global carbon cycle, considering the rapid changes to other large rivers—such as those in the tropics—that transport significant amounts of carbon.

Mississippi river carbon
Human intervention has lowered the amount of carbon released into the air from the Mississippi river. Image: AGU Advances

Zhixiong Shen, a former research assistant professor in Törnqvist’s group and currently an associate professor at Coastal Carolina University, is the paper’s lead author. Additional coauthors are from the University of South Florida and the University of Salzburg in Austria. The National Science Foundation supported the work.

Loading...
Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Share:
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

Translating Critical Raw Material Trade into Development Benefits

Jack Hurd

May 23, 2024

About Us

Events

Media

Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum