- Experiencing a disaster such as COVID-19 or severe flooding can lead to a range of mental health issues such as anxiety and depression.
- These can be short-term, but cumulative exposure to multiple disasters can have a unique effect, writes an expert in disaster and emergency response.
- To avoid burning out and losing resilience against future disasters, we need to improve emotional and material support strategies in society.
- We also need mental health policies, plans, and legislation which supports the most vulnerable through difficult times.
It’s normal to experience a range of reactions following disaster, such as sadness, anxiety, depression, hyperactivity, irritability or even anger.
The good news is, research tells us most people will recover without the need for professional help. Only a small number of people who experience a disaster will go on to develop long-term mental health problems.
But exposure to more than one disaster can take a unique toll.
Cumulative exposure to disaster
We are now beginning to understand the effects of being exposed to multiple disasters. In the United States, people who experienced both Hurricane Katrina in 2005 and the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010 had significantly increased anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) than those who experienced only one of the disasters.
Mental health issues were a significant concern after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill; greater levels of disruption to people’s lives, work, family, and social engagement were associated with increased symptoms of anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress.
People who had also experienced losses from Hurricane Katrina were highly associated with negative mental health outcomes. Those who experienced both disasters were also more likely to report respiratory illness, heart problems, fatigue, headaches and migraines.
Have you read?
Women who were exposed to both the hurricane and the oil spill and experienced illness or injury because of the hurricane disaster were more likely to have poorer mental health compared to the general population.
Meanwhile, New York residents exposed to both the 9/11 attacks and the American Airlines Flight 587 crash that occurred in New York two months later had poorer mental and general health if exposed to both disasters compared to one. This held true for people who experienced direct (including working on the rescue or survivors) or indirect exposure.
What causes this cumulative effect?
One possibility is that experiencing multiple disasters influences our feelings of safety, security, and even our hope for the future, and this increases the negative impact on mental health.
Other research suggests persistent social and economic stress associated with cumulative disaster exposure goes some way to explaining this.
Potential biological mechanisms should also be explored.
Mental health symptoms resulting from exposure to one disaster could also increase vulnerability and erode resilience, making us more susceptible to the effects of subsequent disasters.
Will one more disaster ‘push us over the edge?’
Is there a limit to resilience? Is there a point at which one more disaster will push us over the edge?
According to George Bonanno, a professor of clinical psychology at Columbia University in New York, there’s very little evidence on this.
And capacity for resilience likely depends on a variety of factors unique to each person and their experience.
Bonanno does, however, make a distinction between one-off traumatic events and chronic stress events. He argues chronic stress events, like the COVID-19 pandemic, wear us out. Over time, our capacity to adapt begins to break down.
Cumulative disaster exposure and inequality
While published research on the effects of cumulative disaster exposure on people from disadvantaged backgrounds is lacking, we do know people who are poorer are more likely live in areas which are more vulnerable to natural disasters, as well as housing types which are less protective against disaster risks.
They also generally have poorer physical and mental health to begin with.
So the burden of cumulative disaster exposure, and its effects on resilience, could be worse for people who are disadvantaged.
How has the World Economic Forum helped initiate a more effective response to natural disasters and humanitarian crises?
In 2005, the World Economic Forum helped to establish the Logistics Emergency Teams (LET), a network of representatives from four of the world’s largest logistics and transport companies (Agility, DP World, Maersk and UPS) who work together in partnership with the World Food Programme-led Global Logistics Cluster to deliver free humanitarian assistance.
To date, the LET has responded to more than 20 large-scale natural disasters and humanitarian crises, providing critical logistical support for hurricane victims in Haiti, Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh, tsunami victims in Indonesia, civilians in war-ravaged Yemen and many more.
In 2018, 1,943 employees of LET member companies were trained in humanitarian logistics, contingency operations and disaster response to ensure that they were better prepared for future crises.
Read more about how the LET initiative continues to be an exemplary model for public-private partnerships.
Contact us if you're interested in getting involved in impactful initiatives as a member or partner of the World Economic Forum.
What can we do?
We can help build resilience to the impact of cumulative disasters by improving emotional and material supportive strategies.
Emotional supportive strategies focus on reducing stress and transforming maladaptive behaviours to help reduce emotional, social, and health problems.
Material supportive strategies can include policies providing survivors of disaster with easy and timely access to appropriate resources. We also need mental health policies, plans, and legislation that ensure the care and support of the most vulnerable and marginalised.