- Giant kelp is vital to the ecosystem of the temperate, shallow, nearshore waters where it grows, but it is losing some of its nutritional value due to high temperatures.
- Kelp needs nutrients like nitrogen, which becomes more scarce during warmer seasons. The nitrogen content of the giant kelp tissue declined by 18% over 19 years.
- Lower-nutrition kelp could impact the food web, as each organism in the web consuming the other will receive less nutrients.
Higher temperatures may cost giant kelp some of its nutritional value, research shows.
As a foundational species, giant kelp (Macrocystis pyrifera) is vital to the ecosystem of the temperate, shallow, nearshore waters where it grows. When the kelp flourishes, so do the communities that rely on the fast-growing species for food and shelter.
Kelp’s resilience is an encouraging development for those interested in the alga’s ability to maintain the legions of fish, invertebrates, mammals, and birds that depend on it for their survival.
Have you read?
“The nutritional quality, or the amount of nutrients in the kelp tissue seems to be changing,” says study lead author Heili Lowman, a biogeochemist with the University of Nevada, Reno, who conducted this research as a PhD student in the ecology, evolution, and marine biology department at the University of California, Santa Barbara.
“We found that those changes were associated or correlated with changing seawater temperatures. From a big-picture standpoint, that’s pretty important because there are a lot of things that rely on kelp as the primary food source.”
“I guess you could call it one of the more hidden effects of ocean warming,” says coauthor and UC Santa Barbara graduate student researcher Kyle Emery. “We haven’t necessarily lost kelp in places that have had these big temperature increases, but the kelp there has declined in terms of its nutritional content. So although it’s still there, it’s not able to provide the same function as when temperatures are lower.”
What's the World Economic Forum doing about the ocean?
Our ocean covers 70% of the world’s surface and accounts for 80% of the planet’s biodiversity. We can't have a healthy future without a healthy ocean - but it's more vulnerable than ever because of climate change and pollution.
Tackling the grave threats to our ocean means working with leaders across sectors, from business to government to academia.
The World Economic Forum, in collaboration with the World Resources Institute, convenes the Friends of Ocean Action, a coalition of leaders working together to protect the seas. From a programme with the Indonesian government to cut plastic waste entering the sea to a global plan to track illegal fishing, the Friends are pushing for new solutions.
Climate change is an inextricable part of the threat to our oceans, with rising temperatures and acidification disrupting fragile ecosystems. The Forum runs a number of initiatives to support the shift to a low-carbon economy, including hosting the Alliance of CEO Climate Leaders, who have cut emissions in their companies by 9%.
Is your organization interested in working with the World Economic Forum? Find out more here.
Kelp need constant nitrogen
These findings of ocean warming’s hidden effects on kelp come from long-term data gathered at the Santa Barbara Coastal Long-Term Ecological Research (SBC-LTER) site, which consists of several kelp forests located in the Santa Barbara Channel. Data collected over almost two decades allowed researchers to track patterns of nutrient content, which fluctuate seasonally, and identify significant trends.
“The temperature of the seawater and nutrient availability are really closely coupled in the Santa Barbara Channel, and we’ve known that for some time,” Lowman says. Generally, the cooler temperatures bring nutrient-rich waters up from the deep, but during the warmer seasons, nutrients in the shallows and upper ocean—particularly nitrogen—become more scarce.
“Physiologically, kelp plants can’t store nitrogen for longer than a couple weeks, so whatever’s happening around them in the water they’re going to respond to very quickly because they need a constant supply of nitrogen to grow, and to continue to reproduce,” she says.
Knowing this pattern, the researchers then sought out how nutrient content might play out over a longer period of time, as ocean temperatures rose. They did so by looking at data from the primary productivity sampling conducted in the waters at the SBC LTER on a monthly basis.
“As part of that sampling, kelp blades are collected from these sites, brought back to the lab, and then processed for carbon and nitrogen content,” Emery explains.
On the hunt for food
Over the 19-year period covered by the SBC LTER, according to the paper, nitrogen content of the giant kelp tissue declined by 18%, with a proportional increase in carbon content, according to the paper.
This apparent decline in nutritional content does not bode well for the consumers of kelp in and around the Santa Barbara Channel, which include sea urchins and abalone in the water, and intertidal beach hoppers and other invertebrates that consume the kelp wrack that washes up on the shore.
“As a result, urchins, for example, might go in search of a lot more kelp and that could cause a shift in certain places, potentially from a kelp forest to an urchin barren, if they’re just mowing down the reef looking for more food,” Lowman says. Animals that feed on kelp might also expend more energy trying to eat enough to fulfill their nutritional requirements.
While urchins have the ability to go searching for more food, Emery adds, the consumers on the shore are stuck with what they get.
“If you have greater demand, but there’s not more kelp coming in, that poses a pretty challenging situation for them, whether it’s being underfed or through population declines,” he says.
Giant kelp and the seafood chain
In both cases, the effects could ripple out to the rest of the food web, the researchers say: Lower-nutrition kelp could mean smaller, fewer, perhaps less healthy beach hoppers, for instance, which would lead to less food for the shorebirds that eat them. In the water, less nutrition for urchins and abalone could mean less food for their consumers, including fish, lobster, sea otters, and humans.
“Our results raise a lot of really interesting open-ended questions and suggest a lot of far-reaching effects,” Emery says.
Having explored the potential relationships of seawater temperature to nutritional content, the researchers are considering broadening the spatial scale of the study.
“The next step would be thinking about what all is playing into determining the nutritional content and then how might we then be able to predict it into the future,” Lowman says.