Jobs and the Future of Work

How women venture capitalists invest says a lot about the inequality in their field

Venture capitalist Jenny Lee poses for a portrait in Menlo Park, California August 24, 2015. Long before she became the first woman to figure in the top-10 on Forbes "Midas List" of leading venture capital investors this year, GGV Capital's Lee cut her teeth as an engineer on Singapore's fighter jets. She went on to make millions of dollars betting on China's software and Internet boom - including buying into Xiaomi five years ago when the company had only a prototype of the smartphones that have since catapulted it up the global rankings and turned it into a $45 billion enterprise. Picture taken  August 24, 2015. REUTERS/Robert Galbraith - GF10000181594

Venture capitalist Jenny Lee in 2015, the year she became the first woman to make the top 10 on Forbes’ Midas List. Image: REUTERS/Robert Galbraith

Alexandra Ossola
Features Editor, Futurism
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Jobs and the Future of Work?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Future of Work is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

Future of Work

Female venture capitalists (VCs) have made steady progress over the past few decades, but still make up a small percentage of VCs overall. Data released today (Mar. 25) by grassroots initiative Women in VC reveals the limitations that female VCs are working under, and how they affect the progress of women in VC as well as female founders.

The vast majority of female VCs are investing primarily in early-stage startups, in the seed and series A funding rounds.

Part of the reason they are investing mostly in the early stages is that female VCs have trouble pooling the large sums of money needed for later-stage funding, says Jessica Peltz, a partner at VC firm MDC Ventures. “It’s a big problem,” she adds.

This difficulty in raising large funds affects even well-known female VCs, such as Arlan Hamilton, who has reportedly struggled to attract investors for her $36 million fund, Backstage Capital.

Having female VCs concentrated at the early stages in the process affects female founders, too. Though women led 17% of startups in 2017, they received just 2% of all VC funding in the US. Firms that employ female VCs tend to back higher numbers of female-founded companies. “Do I think women have a competitive advantage versus men when it comes to identifying opportunities in consumer-facing areas where they have more first-party experience? Yes. I think women are better positioned to do that,” says Sutian Dong, a partner at Female Founders Fund, which focuses on early-stage funding. With few female VCs investing in startups’ growth stages, it’s harder for those female-led companies to power through towards profitability.

Have you read?

The Women in Venture Capital data has its limitations. It’s weighted heavily towards VCs in the US, and 86% of its data is self-reported, which can be inaccurate (pdf). But the lesson the data carries is clear: Women in VC will be better represented in VC on the whole once they’re better represented at the mid- and large-sized funds that are better able to back more mature (and less risky) companies.

According to Dong, there’s no one thing that’s keeping female VCs down. It might just be a matter of time until female VCs are investing more evenly across all stages, she says, and that might happen in the next couple of years.

“My hypothesis is that, over time, women will enter in the late [funding] stages where investors will recognize the opportunity they’re leaving on the table if they don’t have women on board who can look at a company like Glossier and say ‘this is the next big thing,'” Dong says.

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Related topics:
Jobs and the Future of WorkEquity, Diversity and InclusionEducation and Skills
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

What can employers do to combat STEM talent shortages?

Timo Lehne

May 21, 2024

About Us



Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum