- A new report shows incomes have stalled in the UK
- People in their 30s now have lower household incomes than those born just a decade before
- That hasn't been the case since the 1930s.
Millennials in Britain have a lower income in their 30s than previous generations did.
While household incomes have grown for each successive generation since the 1930s, this trend has dropped off for those born in the 1980s. It means that, for the first time, people in their 30s have lower household incomes than those born during the previous decade.
This is the key finding of a new report from the Institute of Fiscal Studies (IFS) on generational differences in income and wealth in Great Britain (England, Wales and Scotland but excluding Northern Ireland).
Have you read?
Beyond household income, the gap between the wealth accumulated by those born in the early 80s and the 1970s cohort is about 20%, the IFS suggests.
The reason is not that millennials spend too much on luxuries like the much-maligned avocado toast and save less. Instead, the IFS attributes the drop to a combination of lower average earnings, rising house prices and lower home ownership, in the wake of the financial crisis.
On the positive side, more young people are saving for retirement in a private pension than older age groups, though contribution levels are low, making it hard to build up large pension pots. However, millennials are more likely to inherit from their parents than those born in previous decades, as older generations reach retirement with higher levels of wealth.
Feeling the pinch
Britons are not alone. US millennials are also feeling the pinch. A 2019 study from Pew Research Center shows that earnings have dropped for millennials compared to their predecessors in Generation X. As in Britain, the study suggests that the ‘Great Recession’ is the root of the issue.
However, the impact has been less dramatic for those who achieved at least a bachelor’s degree. The degree-educated group is also the only one that has seen an overall earnings increase since the late 1960s, while those with lower qualifications have seen their earnings drop over that time period.
Household incomes reflect the same drop between the two generations, though it is also less pronounced for those who hold at least a bachelor’s degree.
Focus on shared prosperity, growth and competitiveness
Britain and the US are both examples of countries with rising income inequality, which was highlighted in the World Economic Forum’s 2019 Global Competitiveness Report.
It states that the trajectory of exceptional growth after World War Two, with rising prosperity, set expectations for a continued trend. However, these started to diverge in the 1970s, and more markedly so in the early 2000s.
What do we mean by ‘competitiveness’?
What is economic competitiveness? The World Economic Forum, which has been measuring countries' competitiveness since 1979, defines it as: “the set of institutions, policies and factors that determine the level of productivity of a country." Other definitions exist, but all generally include the word “productivity”.
The Global Competitiveness Report is a tool to help governments, the private sector, and civil society work together to boost productivity and generate prosperity. Comparative analysis between countries allows leaders to gauge areas that need strengthening and build a coordinated response. It also helps identify best practices around the world.
The Global Competitive Index forms the basis of the report. It measures performance according to 114 indicators that influence a nation’s productivity. The latest edition covered 141 economies, accounting for over 98% of the world’s GDP.
Countries’ scores are based primarily on quantitative findings from internationally recognized agencies such as the International Monetary Fund and World Health Organization, with the addition of qualitative assessments from economic and social specialists and senior corporate executives.
Growing inequality is often blamed on globalization and technology. However, the Global Competitiveness Report makes the case that policy choices such as deregulation of labour and finance markets, changing tax regimes, and reduced public investments are the real culprits. The same goes for a lack of preparation for the Fourth Industrial Revolution.