Rethinking how we give to charity

Lutfey Siddiqi
Visiting Professor-in-Practice, London School of Economics and Political Science
Share:
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

Hyperconnectivity

I often run into two groups of altruistic people at World Economic Forum events. The first are specialists such as doctors and engineers who deliver their expertise directly to people in difficult situations. The second are those who have switched careers to help a cause they believe in.

Both groups are inspiring, not least because they approach their calling full-time and at the expense of alternative careers in the mainstream and possibly more lucrative arenas. There are also people who are not quite ready to give it all up, yet are keen to give back in any way that they can. Paying a small percentage of one’s income by direct debit into some charity ticks the basic box, but it is impersonal and often doesn’t provide a sense of contribution.

For a donor to feel good about giving, they need to sacrifice time and effort. This is the reason that people brave a challenge, conquer a fear or run a marathon to raise funds. This is also the reason that people volunteer time, on weekends for example, for charity work, whether it’s visiting the elderly or picking litter up off a beach.

There is yet another alternative, one that I call the “comparative advantage approach” to doing good. About 200 years ago, British Economist David Ricardo argued that it makes more sense for countries to specialize in their areas of relative productivity advantage and trade with each other as opposed to allocating resources to every area of absolute advantage.

This approach – when applied to social enterprise – begins with the acknowledgement that similar to other professions, the delivery of social outcomes is a specialized job that requires specialist skills. It is perhaps challenging for someone to step into a certain role for a few hours on a weekend and expect to make meaningful impact.

Instead, the following two-step approach might achieve more impact:

  1. Do something that productively employs your core skills (outside of your day job and outside normal working hours) at a fully professional level of competence. For this, you should expect to get paid full commercial wages.
  2. Donate the money to those who specialize in charitable services.

Whether it’s teaching at a night school on weekends, writing a book, giving a concert or providing accounting services, you should volunteer in your core area of competence. Choose an area that gives you the highest earning power for a finite number of hours.

The result of your money and your personal time will now stretch that much farther.

Author: Lutfey Siddiqi is Adjunct Professor at the Risk Management Institute, National University of Singapore and a Managing Director at UBS Investment bank. He is also a World Economic Forum Young Global Leader.

Image: Children donate money for eartquake vitims in Jinan, China REUTERS/Stringer

 

 

 

 

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Share:
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

About Us

Events

Media

Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum