Emerging Technologies

What is the future of microbiome research?

Jon Turney
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Emerging Technologies?
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

Emerging Technologies

Biologists’ knowledge of the human microbiome has exploded in the last decade, driven by advances in big data and DNA testing. The richness of the information collected raises myriad new and exciting questions for scientists.

As with any new realm of knowledge, a first effort consists in categorisation. We know that thousands of species of bacteria inhabit the gut, for example, but we may discover their true diversity to be much greater. As for viruses, the most abundant biological entities on Earth, only 5-25% of them have been classified so far.

This is, in part, because singling out a specific microbe can be challenging: Microbes often need a community of other microbes to grow, making monoculture difficult. Developed under the Human Microbiome Project and commercialised by GE since last year, a new technology now enables researchers to isolate a single cell’s DNA and to reproduce it in just a few hours. The process, which uses Phi29 DNA polymerase, enables researchers to grow micrograms samples from samples as light as one femtogram (a billionth of a microgram). Such technologies could facilitate single-cell sequencing and, over time, enable researchers to understand how a specific microbe contributes to the microbiome.

While that work goes ahead, others are pursuing the exploration of the molecular mechanisms through which bacteria interact with one another. “We know virtually nothing about most microbiota metabolites that are produced in vivo, even though these are the key molecules that microbes use to converse with each other and the host,” notes Brett Finlay of the University of British Columbia in a paper published earlier this year. John Cryan of University College, Cork, agrees. “We really have to get at these mechanisms,” he says.

Medical treatments may not need to wait for that. Plenty of drugs are currently in use whose precise mode of action is not known. But they still need clinical testing. So, emphasises Mr Cryan, do any claims for probiotics—foodstuffs containing bacteria, or bacteria themselves, that are consumed for some supposed benefit.

Microbe engineering is another area attracting interest—and investment. Just last month, the Gates Foundation issued a call for proposals for experiments on manipulating the gut microbiome with bacteriophages in ways that might prevent malnutrition in children in the developing world.

At the opposite extreme from this investigation of the potential of minuscule bacterial viruses is the only manipulation of the microbiome that has proven successful so far: a total faecal microbiome transplant (FMT) to relieve chronic intestinal infection caused by the Clostridium difficile bacteria. Much work remains to be done, however. This includes establishing which bacteria are actually beneficial, standardising the faecal or faecal-derived cultures that are used and setting up the appropriate regulatory system—FMT is still considered an investigational drug in the US.

The new worlds of the microbiome also raise questions that go beyond direct applications. The fact that microbes were here before any other kind of life, for example, begs for reaching an understanding of how humans and their microbial communities co-evolved. That may seem like a distant goal, but it is one systems and computational biologists have started to pursue, one cell at a time. For now, efforts have focused on Mycoplasms genitalium, one of the simplest bacteria we know. Scaling up to trillions of bacteria, to thousands of species and to multitudinous interactions with human cells is still a long way off.

In the end, virtually no aspect of human biology is likely to remain untouched by microbiome research. As Mr Cryan emphasises, “What’s great about this field is that it is extremely multidisciplinary and people are all talking to each other.”

This post first appeared on GE LookAhead. Publication does not imply endorsement of views by the World Economic Forum.

To keep up with the Agenda subscribe to our weekly newsletter.

Author: Jon Turney is a contributor at GE LookAhead.

Image: A researcher, seen through a window, prepares DNA in a laboratory. REUTERS/Robert Pratta. 

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

How to build the skills needed for the age of AI

Juliana Guaqueta Ospina

April 11, 2024


About Us



Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum