Why are maternal death rates still high?

Tim Pearce
Editor, Thomas Reuters Foundation
Share:
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale

This article is published in collaboration with Trust.org (Thomson Reuters Foundation)

Only nine countries have achieved a U.N. development goal of reducing the number of women dying before, during or after giving birth by 75 percent since 1990, the United Nations and the World Bank said.

Worldwide, maternal mortality fell by 43 percent in the 25-year period, thanks to access to better-quality health services during pregnancy and childbirth, and to sexual and reproductive health services and family planning, they said in a report.

“Over the past 25 years, a woman’s risk of dying from pregnancy-related causes has nearly halved,” said Flavia Bustreo, assistant director-general for family, women’s and children’s health at the World Health Organization (WHO).

U.N. member states pledged in 2000 to reduce maternal mortality, defined as a woman’s death during pregnancy, childbirth or within 6 weeks after birth, by three quarters by 2015 as part of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGS).

The Maldives, Bhutan, Cambodia, Cape Verde, East Timor, Iran, Laos, Mongolia and Rwanda reduced maternal mortality by between 78 and 90 percent, the organisations’ report said.

Globally, the number of maternal deaths dropped 43 percent to an estimated 303,000 this year from about 532,000 in 1990, or to 216 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births from 385 in 1990, the report said.

East Asia saw the sharpest drop, to 27 deaths per 100,000 live births from 90.

A new set of targets adopted by world leaders in September – the Sustainable Development Goals – includes reducing maternal deaths to fewer than 70 per 100,000 live births globally.

That will require the pace of reduction to more than triple to 7.5 percent per year, beginning in 2016, from the 2.3 percent annual improvement between 1990 and 2015, the report said.

Publication does not imply endorsement of views by the World Economic Forum.

To keep up with the Agenda subscribe to our weekly newsletter.

Author: Tim Pearce is an editor at the Thomas Reuters Foundation. 

Image: A woman holds her newborn baby. REUTERS/Andreea Campeanu.

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Share:
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

About Us

Events

Media

Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum