Jobs and the Future of Work

Does working fewer hours make you more productive?

Time for a coffee break? Image: REUTERS/Issei Kato

Emma Luxton
Senior Writer , Forum Agenda
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Jobs and the Future of Work?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Future of Work is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

Future of Work

Want to work better? Work less, say researchers at the OECD, who have discovered an interesting correlation between how much you work and how productive you are: working longer hours results in a reduction of labour output.

Source: OECD

This chart shows hours worked per person in OECD countries between 1990 and 2012, and the GDP created per hour worked. It reveals that productivity is highest when people spend fewer hours working.

The relationship between hours worked and productivity has interested economists for many years. But a new paper by John Pencavel of Stanford University, based on a set of data compiled during the First World War, may have the answers they have been searching for.

The British Health of Munition Workers Committee (HMWC) undertook research into how to maximize the productivity of workers in munitions plants, looking at the link between work hours and work performance.

Source: IZA

Pencavel’s analysis shows that working more hours doesn’t necessarily increase overall output, but neither does working a very short week.

He found that the optimum number of hours for productivity in munitions plants was around 48 per week. Below that amount, and output was proportional to the hours worked. But once workers clocked up more than 48 hours, output started to fall. The chart above illustrates this.

Although these results appear to indicate that working up to 50 hours a week might increase productivity, they do not take into account service-sector professions: the type of work done by most people in advanced economies today. For these professions, where work is primarily self-directed and requires intellectual engagement, the optimum number of weekly hours may, in fact, be lower.

Pencavel notes that the “profit-maximizing employer will not be indifferent to the length of … working hours over a day or week”. His new research could encourage companies to stop focusing so much on how many hours their employees are working, and instead look at ways of optimizing productivity – even if that means they end up working less.

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

Pride Month: Nearly a third of LGBTQI+ workers have quit a job over feeling uncomfortable – here’s how to build more inclusive workplaces

Sander van't Noordende

June 17, 2024

About Us



Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum