Mental Health

A woman living with bipolar explains what’s wrong with mental healthcare today

Matthew Kolen, who was diagnosed at age eight with Asperger's syndrome, puts his hand over his head while doing his homework in Long Island, New York April 16, 2012.

Bipolar and schizophrenia sufferers typically lose 15-20 years of their lives because of their illnesses Image: REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton

Natasha Tracy
Share:
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Mental Health?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Mental Health is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

Mental Health

I have a serious mental illness. Specifically, I have bipolar disorder. I have been navigating how mental illness is treated for 18 years. And I strongly believe that how we treat mental illness is all wrong.

One of the biggest mistakes in how mental illness is treated comes from the healthcare system. Unfortunately, we treat mental illness as if it is separate from all other illnesses. Somehow, “mental” doesn’t mean “physical” to the healthcare system.

But what is clear is that “mental” illnesses are diseases of the brain. It is also clear there is no physical wellness without brain wellness. No one would ever argue this point in the case of a brain injury and people shouldn’t argue it in the case of a brain illness either.

1. Mental illness is put in a silo

Moreover, mental illness care tends to be siloed. In other words, those who treat mental illness aren’t treating the rest of the body, and care information is not being shared between professionals. This is a huge problem for patients. For example, if a person smokes cigarettes, more common in the mentally ill population than anywhere else, who should handle his or her smoking cessation care? And shouldn’t all healthcare professionals know about this effort, particularly considering that efforts to stop smoking may require medication?

Luckily, we know that when mental illness is treated as a physical illness and considered alongside other aspects of physical well-being, it does get better and overall health gets better. Putting people with mental illness on a par with everyone else in the healthcare system can bring us up and forward in care.

2. The mentally ill often lack specialist care

Another large mistake is that mental illness care is commonly given by general practitioners. While general practitioners are, typically, the first healthcare professionals that a person with a mental illness will see, they shouldn’t be the last. General practitioner are just that – general – they know a little about a lot of things. But they are not specialists and psychiatry is a specialty. No one would suggest that a general practitioner treat a specialty like cancer, and mental illness needs to be treated the same way. While it can be difficult to provide enough specialized psychiatric care in some places, it is worth encouraging, particularly for serious mental illnesses.

3. There’s discrimination in research funding - and life

Finally, there is the issue of research dollars. While organizations all over the world do work on trying to improve the outlooks of those with mental illness, they do not get the same kind of funding as other illnesses do. Particularly when one considers that the seriously mentally ill, for example those suffering from bipolar and schizophrenia, lose between 15-20 years of their lives because of their illnesses, these illnesses should be considered a societal epidemic and a major priority, not something that should just get leftover money.

I believe it is because society, predominantly, still looks down on those with mental illness, and many still feel that these illnesses are somehow our fault, that they are not considered a priority. People still consider it okay to discriminate against those with mental illness and this carries over into research dollars. People still think the mentally ill can’t maintain full-time jobs and so hiring us is “too risky.” People still think it’s okay to discriminate against the mentally ill seeking housing because we won’t pay our rent. And while these things aren’t true – I’ve disproved them personally as have many others – it’s a societal view that these are realities. These views harm how people with mental illness are treated and minimal research money is just part of that discrimination.

In the same way that mental illness should be treated by healthcare systems on a par with other physical illnesses, research dollars need to be treated the same way. About 1% of people in industrialized countries have schizophrenia. About 1.5% of people have bipolar disorder. While no one knows what more research dollars will do, we owe the people who have these serious disorders the chance to find out.
_____________________________________________________________________

Have you read?
How treating mental illness pays for itself
An estimated 350m people suffer from depression. Could this help reverse it?
_____________________________________________________________________

The way ahead

While these are large, systemic problems in the treatment of mental illness, there is no reason why they have to continue forever.

Just as insane asylums were emptied in the mid-20th century, it is now time for mental illness to step further into the light of society and be treated equally. This is not an easy thing to do. It will require effort from society, governments, healthcare systems and more, but globally we are making strides and we can make more.

References

Medscape, Bipolar Affective Disorder. Accessed September 18, 2016.
Medscape, Schizophrenia. Accessed September 18, 2016.
Wahlbeck et al., Outcomes of Nordic Mental Health Systems: Life Expectancy of Patients with Mental Disorders. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 2011.

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Share:
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

From 'Quit-Tok' to proximity bias, here are 11 buzzwords from the world of hybrid work

Kate Whiting

April 17, 2024

About Us

Events

Media

Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum