Health and Healthcare Systems

These are the different schemes around the world promoting people to get vaccinated

A woman receives a vaccination against the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) as part of a Tel Aviv municipality initiative offering a free drink at a bar to residents getting the shot, in Tel Aviv, Israel February 18, 2021. REUTERS/Corinna Kern - RC26VL9AZFSZ

Londoners who got inoculated had the chance to win tickets to the final of The Euro 2020 soccer Championship. Image: REUTERS/Corinna Kern

Sonia Elks
Journalist, Reuters
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Health and Healthcare Systems?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how COVID-19 is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:


  • Countries around the world are incentivising citizens to get a COVID-19 vaccine.
  • Examples include entering raffles to win cars and winning a $1.5 million lottery.
  • Other countries are enforcing stricter measures such as fines for those who shun vaccines.

Authorities and companies are offering a dizzying array of incentives to boost COVID vaccination rates and turn a page on the pandemic.

Get a COVID-19 jab in Moscow and you could leave with a lot more than a sore arm - the city is giving away five cars a week in a prize draw for residents who get vaccinated.

Londoners who get inoculated had the chance to win tickets to the final of The Euro 2020 soccer Championship and residents of California are in with a chance of scooping a $1.5 million lottery jackpot. Romanians who get a vaccine dose, meanwhile, are being rewarded with a barbequed sausage sandwich.

From dollars to cows, donuts and even drugs, a dizzying array of incentives are being offered by authorities and companies around the world in a bid to win around the vaccine hesitant as they seek to turn a page on the pandemic.

But as countries strive to reach 'herd immunity' - where enough people are protected against a disease that it becomes difficult for infections to spread - others are opting to slap fines and other penalties on anyone who refuses the jab.

As mass vaccination drives progress around the world, which approach is proving more effective?

A pedestrian wearing a face mask walks near a poster promoting coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccination in Hong Kong, China March 23, 2021.
Countries around the world are employing strategies for an increase in vaccination uptakes. Image: REUTERS/Lam Yik

Why are incentives necessary?

Researchers developed highly effective vaccines against COVID-19 in record time, but many people are reluctant to take them, often because they worry about the safety of the vaccines or fear rare but serious side-effects.

That has prompted officials to look for ways to convince them otherwise.

In some cases that might involve allaying health fears and tackling "fake news" with information campaigns, or making sure vaccines are easy to access. But officials are also using perks - and occasionally punishments - to persuade people to go ahead.

What kind of perks are on offer?

Some U.S. states are holding lotteries for vaccinated residents with large cash prizes on offer, with Cambodia kicking off a similar incentive.

California's $116.5-million plan is designed to encourage more people to get the jab ahead of June 15, when many coronavirus restrictions are set to be lifted. Thirty people have already scooped $50,000 prizes, with another 10 Californians in line for a $1.5m payout. The state is also giving out 2 million $50 gift cards.

In Moscow, which is battling a surge in coronavirus cases, anyone who receives the first of a two-dose vaccine up until July 11 was entered into a draw with five cars worth 1 million roubles ($13,900) being given away every week.

In a Philippine town, the mayor is planning a cow raffle as an incentive, while another community has been raffling off huge sacks of rice, after finding it hard to persuade people to get their shots. Mexican vaccination centres are instead laying on entertainment in the hope of making it fun to get a jab.

Businesses are also getting in on the act, from free beer in Israel to complimentary dessert in Malaysia. In Hong Kong, a property developer is raffling off a $1.4 million apartment for people who have been vaccinated.

And Washington State has allowed retailers to offer a free marijuana joint when they get a shot in ‘joints for jabs’ promotions.

Many companies say they want to support the vaccine drive out of concern for their home communities. Offering deals and freebies can also be a financial boost for firms that might hope customers linger and buy more.

Some companies are hoping to persuade employees to get their jabs by offering cash bonuses.

A healthcare worker prepares to inoculate a man with Sinovac's CoronaVac coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccine during a COVID-19 mass vaccination programme at the Indonesia Stock Exchange in Jakarta, Indonesia, March 31, 2021.
The Indonesian capital Jakarta introduced fines of up to 5 million rupiah ($350) for people who shun vaccination. Image: REUTERS/Willy Kurniawan

Which is more effective - rewards or deterrents?

Popular psychology suggests rewards are more effective than punishment, but research on vaccine hesitancy indicates that both can be effective in certain contexts.

Mandates and sanctions for non-vaccination were effective in increasing uptake, according to a review of studies carried out by the World Health Organization in 2014, with cash incentive schemes seen as likely to be less successful.

More recent research found incentives helped seal the deal.

About a third of unvaccinated Americans said they would be more likely to get the coronavirus shot in return for $100, found a survey by the University of California, Los Angeles, though some 20% said a cash reward would put them off.

And what are the medical ethics of these schemes?

Incentives are an ethical way forward while deterrents and punishments should be wielded with great care, said Nancy Kass, deputy director for public health at the John Hopkins University's Berman Institute of Bioethics in the United States.

"It's always better ethically to at least start by providing information, encouraging people, making it easy for people and doing all of those kinds of things before moving to a mandate," she told the Thomson Reuters Foundation by phone.

Relatively few people are "deeply philosophically opposed" to getting a shot, which means inducements and nudges might be enough to reach the numbers needed, she said.

And there is a significant moral difference between restrictions that push people to weigh up their options as compared to heavy fines that leave them with little real choice, Kass said.

"My fear is people jumping to (compulsory orders) as a first strategy rather than a last-mile strategy," she said.

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

Feeding the future: why Renovation and Reinvention are key to saving our food system

Juliana Weltman Glezer

June 13, 2024

About Us



Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum