Nature and Biodiversity

Which countries emit the most greenhouse gas?

Michael Hanley
Share:
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Nature and Biodiversity?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Future of the Environment is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

Future of the Environment

Negotiators are meeting in the lead up to the United Nations’ 21st Conference of the Parties in December this year.

In Paris, the hope is that the world’s governments will come to an agreement on how much and how quickly countries will limit their emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases, in order to ensure that the world’s climate does not warm by more than 2 degrees on average.

So, which countries will come under the most pressure to transform their economies, on account of their high carbon-dioxide emissions? It is a fraught question, made more so by complicated measurement and methodology.

Firstly, there is the question of whether you include or exclude change of land use. A country can radically affect its emissions levels by changing what it is doing with its land – clearing forests for crops, shifting from crop growing to cattle grazing, for instance – hundreds of different regulated and unregulated land usages that are monitored and included in calculations of greenhouse gas emissions (GHG). The tables below show calculations that both include and exclude land-use changes.

Secondly, which measure matters? Is it the absolute amount of carbon dioxide emitted by a country in a particular year? In which case, it would be the world’s largest economies: China, the United States and Europe.

total_ghg_emissions_2012

That is not entirely fair, though: China argues that for each person, the country emits far fewer greenhouse gases. If we take a per capita measure, then those countries that produce fossil fuels, and export them, come top of the table.

ghg_emissions_per_capita_2012

Taking just one year of emissions data is also misleading. What about a country’s history of carbon emissions? The following table shows cumulative absolute emissions since 1990.

cumulative_ghg_emissions_90-12 (2)

And developing countries would argue that these figures don’t go back nearly far enough. What about the 150 years before 1990, during which the rich countries underwent all their industrialization, and contributed most to the stock of carbon dioxide in the world’s atmosphere?

The negotiators face a complicated job, given the proliferation of measures and factors. If what is measured matters, the basis of measurement is a crucial starting point.

Author: Mike Hanley, Head of Digital Communication, World Economic Forum. 

Image: A demonstrator holds up a sign during a march past the White House to protest against the Keystone XL pipeline in Washington. REUTERS/Richard Clement 

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Related topics:
Nature and BiodiversityGlobal Cooperation
Share:
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

Why nature-positive cities can help transform the planet

Carlos Correa Escaf

May 24, 2024

About Us

Events

Media

Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum