Future of Work

How do we close Africa’s employment gap?

Ellen McCullough
PhD candidate in the Charles H. Dyson School of Applied Economics, Cornell University
Share:
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Future of Work?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Future of Work is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

Future of Work

Labor productivity in Sub-Saharan Africa has been garnering attention recently. Development economists focus on labor productivity because it tends to be strongly associated with overall well-being measures, especially for the poor, who are reliably endowed with time, but often little else in the way of productive assets.

Cross-sector gaps in labor productivity are key indicators of structural change, which is the economy-wide process by which labor shifts from low-productivity industries such as agriculture, to those that are higher-productivity, such as industry and services. This process underpins development and is premised on large cross-sector gaps in productivity. Economists expect these gaps to be quite large in the poorest countries, and to get smaller as labor shifts out of agriculture. Recent evidence suggests these forces are indeed at work in Sub-Saharan Africa.
In a new study focused on Ethiopia, Malawi, Tanzania and Malawi, I find that the agricultural sector is not necessarily a bastion of low productivity, as is commonly believed, but rather a large reservoir of underemployed workers. This result emerges when labor inputs are measured more carefully. Using the new LSMS-ISA datasets, I used micro-data to replicate the common patterns observed in macro statistics; that annual economic output per worker is lower in agriculture than in other sectors. While national statistics suggest that workers in these four countries are 6 times more productive outside of agriculture than in it, I predict the number is closer to 3.3x on average (See figure 1). This finding was consistent with those of Gollin et. al., who recently found that national accounts measures tend to under-estimate productivity in agriculture relative to other sectors.


The left panel shows sector output per worker per year in agriculture (green) relative to industry and services (orange and blue, respectively). National accounts based ratios of output per worker per year are shown in grey. The right panel shows sector outputs per hour of labor supplied in agriculture, industry and services.

Next, I took a closer look at labor inputs. Many workers are counted as agricultural because they spend at least some time working on farms. A striking pattern across household surveys is that agricultural workers work fewer hours per year — 700 hours per agricultural worker compared to 1,900 hours per non-agricultural worker. Interestingly, it turns out that productivity in agriculture is a lot closer to productivity outside of it when one accounts for these differences in hours worked. On a per-hour basis, then, labor is only 1.6x more productive outside of agriculture.

Why don’t agricultural workers work more hours per year? While beyond the scope of my study, this question begs for more research. One explanation relates to agronomic conditions in Sub-Saharan Africa. Given a somewhat fixed supply of agricultural land, and limited water control, demand for farm labor is not well smoothed throughout the year. This could limit the ability of smallholder farmers to productively use more labor on their farms.

Another explanation for the employment gap is that few people are able to participate in non-farming activities. Non-agricultural wage employment is low, with 10% of adult individuals in rural areas participating. Self-employment outside of agriculture is also low, with 17% of adults in rural areas taking part. And though these activities are non-agricultural, closer examination of their descriptions suggests that they are indeed tightly linked to agricultural production.

These findings highlight the importance of thinking more about agricultural labor – not just counting workers, but finding ways for more people to productively supply more labor to agriculture, the dominant employment sector in Sub-Saharan Africa.

This post first appeared on The World Bank Africa Can End Poverty Blog.

Publication does not imply endorsement of views by the World Economic Forum.

To keep up with the Agenda subscribe to our weekly newsletter.

Author: Ellen McCullough is a PhD candidate in the Charles H. Dyson School of Applied Economics at Cornell University.

Image: Ndeye Astou Fall, 22, works at a call centre in Senegal’s capital Dakar. REUTERS/Finbarr O’Reilly 

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Share:
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

From 'Quit-Tok' to proximity bias, here are 11 buzzwords from the world of hybrid work

Kate Whiting

April 17, 2024

3:12

About Us

Events

Media

Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum