Jobs and the Future of Work

Why closing the gender gap should be a priority for all of us

Eric Parrado
Chief Economist; General Manager, Research Department, Inter-American Development Bank
Share:
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Jobs and the Future of Work?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Future of Work is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

Future of Work

Despite recent efforts, many countries are constantly losing talent, human capital and well-being because of gender inequality and the often dismissive attitude towards it in many societies. According to the latest ranking of the Global Gender Gap Report prepared annually by the World Economic Forum, North America is in the top position with 75% of the gap being closed with Europe and Central Asia close behind with an average of 73%.

After these groups of countries, Latin America and the Caribbean follow, then Sub-Saharan Africa, and Asia and the Pacific. The last region in the ranking is the Middle East and North Africa. Keeping the status quo and not changing the mindset towards the gender gap in every country is simply shameful, even for developed countries. It is time to act now and not wait for these numbers to change on their own. Gender parity must be a strategic priority for both the private and public sectors.

There are multiple reasons for closing the gender gap. A direct and powerful reason to seek gender equality is, of course, equity. Women represent half of the population and therefore deserve not only equal access to health and education, but also greater economic participation, influence, and political participation. Unfortunately, this simply is not happening or is being done very slowly around the world. The problem is that we are not only being unfair, we are also losing wealth by not considering the total capacity of our human capital and talent from half of our population.

parity-vs-performance-gender

Looking on the bright side, we have seen that in just over a decade the proportion of women in the workforce in several countries has increased. But on the other hand, we see that most of the jobs that women have access to are concentrated in positions that require relatively low skills and therefore, pay low wages. And even for the same positions, the wage gap between men and women remains significant. For instance, in a S&Ps ExecuComp database used by Albanesi et al (2015) the ratio between the total compensation of women and men top executives in the United States is 82%.

This is also reflected in the results of a revealing survey by the Chilean Banking Regulator, which will be published in detail in the fourth quarter of 2015. The survey shows that in the banking system, women fill the majority of low-paid positions. In other top positions, from intermediate positions to board members, the participation of women decreases dramatically. In particular, only seven women are registered as members of the board of a total of 127 directorships. That is, half of our population holds only 5.5% of the positions on the strategic decisions making structures of the banking industry.

If someone believes that fairness, justice, and different visions and leadership styles are not assets in and of themselves, they should be convinced by economic reasons. According to a recent study Cuberes and Teignier, the fact that many women are excluded is related to the decrease in the potential talent of entrepreneurs in the economy. And this is ultimately reflected in the wealth and economic well-being of countries. The authors estimate that, for example, OECD countries could be 15% richer, on average, if they close the gender gap, and even more in both emerging and developing economies.

But this requires a change of attitude by every one of us, particularly men, and independently of the level of economic development of our countries. We can all contribute through a change in attitudes and intelligent diversity policies in the private and public spheres. This does not have to pose a threat to meritocracy. So, I firmly share the reflection of the English philosopher Mary Wollstonecraft “I do not wish women to have power over men, but over themselves.” This can be achieved with the participation of all and especially the contribution of men.

Have you read?
Which countries are best – and worst – for female entrepreneurs?
Why valuing caregiving is key to closing the gender gap
This is what the world’s education gender gap looks like

Author: Eric Parrado, Superintendent, Superintendency of Banks and Financial Institutions of Chile

Image: A woman uses her mobile phone at an office building in Tokyo July 21, 2015. REUTERS/Toru Hanai

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Related topics:
Jobs and the Future of WorkEquity, Diversity and Inclusion
Share:
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

The green skills gap: Educational reform in favour of renewable energy is now urgent

Roman Vakulchuk

April 24, 2024

About Us

Events

Media

Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum