$600 a month, no strings attached? Sounds like a reason to be celebrating. Image: REUTERS/Dylan Martinez
Explore and monitor how Inequality is affecting economies, industries and global issues
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:
How would you like to get more than $600 a month, no strings attached?
Sound too good to be true?
Not in Finland, where they’re experimenting with giving unemployed people a basic income, with the hope that it would provide a stronger incentive to work than the current, more bureaucratic model.
While the concept of a basic income isn’t new, it’s gained traction in recent years as policy makers grapple with alleviating poverty, growing inequality and the job losses that are likely to go hand-in-hand with automation.
Similar ideas have been advocated by prominent business people including bond investor Bill Gross and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, and tests have also been carried out in countries including Canada, Uganda and Kenya.
As well as streamlining social security processes, proponents of the idea say it could also cut the health problems associated with poverty, saving money in the longer term.
However, critics say such plans are too costly, not practical, and would disincentivize people to find jobs.
So does it work?
Well, it depends what you’re looking for.
Initial findings from the first of a two-year programme in Finland, where participants were given 560 euros (around $630) per month, showed positive effects on health and stress, but no improvement in work status.
“There is no statistically significant difference between the groups as regards employment,” researchers including Olli Kangas wrote in the report. “However, the survey results showed significant differences between the groups for different aspects of wellbeing.”
The individuals who received a basic income were no more likely to find work than those who didn’t, according to results from the first year of the experiment. Finding out why this is and the dynamics at play will form part of a broader investigation that will be published in 2020.
So while the government’s aim to “promote more active participation” and “provide a stronger incentive to work” doesn’t seem to have been met, success can be found in other areas.
“Those in the test group experienced significantly fewer problems related to health, stress and ability to concentrate than those in the control group,” the researchers wrote. “Those in the test group were also considerably more confident in their own future and their ability to influence societal issues than the control group.”
With improvements seen in those areas in just a year, it’s clear that more investigation is needed before final conclusions can be drawn, with the preliminary results offering something for advocates and critics of basic income alike.
Don't miss any update on this topic
Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.
License and Republishing
The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.
More on InequalitySee all
Nicolai Ruge and Danny Quah
February 28, 2024
February 20, 2024
February 8, 2024
Samantha Akwei and Ginelle Greene-Dewasmes
February 5, 2024
February 5, 2024
Attilio Di Battista and Douglas Alan Beal
January 16, 2024