Trade and Investment

Here's why globalization is here to stay

Shipping containers in a port as seen from above.

Crises create only temporary blips in economic activity. Image: Unsplash/CHUTTERSNAP

Angie Basiouny
Writer / Editor, Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Trade and Investment?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Trade and Investment is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

Trade and Investment

  • Some experts believe Russia's war in Ukraine is bringing about the end of globalization.
  • But the dependencies countries have on each other are here to stay, argues a Wharton management professor.
  • He thinks it would take a crisis on an even larger scale to halt globalization.

BlackRock CEO Larry Fink thinks the war in Ukraine is accelerating the end of globalization that has shaped the new world order for the last 30 years.

Oaktree Capital Management founder Howard Marks said the war is forcing the pendulum of international affairs to swing away from globalization as companies and governments rethink their interdependence.

Wharton management professor Exequiel (Zeke) Hernandez disagrees. He said it will take much more than a conflict between two countries to destroy the economic fundamentals of international trade.

“I believe that there could be some short-term disruption, but I don’t believe that globalization in the medium to long run is going to be completely obliterated, which I think is the spirit of a lot of these predictions,” he said during an interview with Wharton Business Daily on SiriusXM.

Simply put, companies and countries need each other. Reaching beyond borders is how they secure their supply chains, grow their customer base, find skilled and unskilled labor, and provide the population with all the goods and services they demand.

“For most reasonably sized businesses, the home market is just not large enough of a market, so they need to serve foreign markets,” Hernandez said. “That will mean having more global or, more commonly, regional supply chains.”


How is the World Economic Forum ensuring sustainable global markets?

The professor pointed out that doomsday predictions about the end of globalization have been made before, usually during times of crisis. At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, The Economist ran a cover story about it, and similar declarations were made during the Great Recession of 2008. But he said crises create only “temporary blips” in economic activity, like the sharp drops induced by sudden pandemic lockdowns.

“I don’t believe that globalization in the medium to long run is going to be completely obliterated.”

Zeke Hernandez

“It happens all the time,” Hernandez said about the negative predictions. “I think we have to distinguish between short-term disruption and structural changes in the economy.”

Hernandez has maintained his stance on globalization for years, writing in a 2020 blog post that while his position may be “boring” compared with the naysayers, it’s based on facts.

“I believe that an approach based on basic facts — even if boring — may help calm down some of the anxiety about the future of globalization,” he wrote.

Hernandez said one reason why the declarations about globalization’s demise are overblown is that the world’s economy isn’t really as entangled as people think it is. Foreign direct investment, for example, accounts for just 4% of the global economy. And South Korean multinational firms such as Samsung and Hyundai conduct only 10% to 15% of their business outside their geographic region, with the bulk of it inside Southeast Asia.

Have you read?

To be sure, authoritarian regimes often cut themselves off from the global market for a host of reasons — Russia’s Vladimir Putin is just one example. But firms often respond by shifting their activities elsewhere in the world. That’s why Hernandez thinks it will take world war on a larger scale to create the kind of disruption that would halt globalization.

“Unless you have authoritarianism and protectionism rise to a level where every country wants to be economically self-sufficient, you’re not going to make a big dent,” he said. “The only thing that will happen is you might shift which countries are more involved in trading and doing business with each other.”

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Related topics:
Trade and InvestmentGeo-Economics and PoliticsGlobal Cooperation
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

World merchandise trade rebound, and other global trade stories to read this month

Matthew Stephenson

April 23, 2024

About Us



Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum