Economic Growth

Opinion: Why we need to shift towards a destination-based corporate tax system for a fairer world

man's hands using a calculator

A shift towards destination-based corporate tax rules would make for a fairer global tax system. Image: Unsplash/Towfiqu barbhuiya

Nir Yaacobi
Lecturer in economics, Israel Academic College
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Economic Growth?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Taxes is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:


Listen to the article

  • More than 130 countries have agreed to set a minimum global corporate tax rate of 15% from 2023, under the OECD's global tax deal.
  • But these rules are just further complicating an already complex system, which will limited effect on issues such as tax avoidance.
  • We need to move from an origin-based corporate tax rules to a destination-based ones for a more just and efficient global tax system.

In October 2021, more than 130 countries agreed to set a minimum global corporate tax rate of 15%, to enable taxing companies in the places where their customers or digital users are.

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development's (OECD) global tax deal, which will apply from 2023, aims to reduce incentives for avoidance by multinational companies while limiting tax competition – the so-called “race to the bottom” where every country lowers its tax rate to attract businesses to relocate to its jurisdiction.

Have you read?

This deal is viewed by many as a big breakthrough in tackling distributive injustice carried out through international tax planning by multinational corporations.

Global tax deal will not sufficiently tackle issues such as tax avoidance

Well, I am sorry for being a party pooper, but this would only provide more jobs for tax advisors, accountants, lawyers and tax officials to develop methods of taking advantage of these new rules for more tax avoidance, leaving the goodwill with limited results.

Such rules are tangling the tax code further and beyond what it is already very complicated for the economy.

A taste of the complexity of these new rules can be seen in the language of the following examples: "taxing sales of foreign companies with global revenues of more than €20 billion and profitability above 10%" and "25% of residual profit defined as profit in excess of 10% of revenue will be allocated to market jurisdictions with nexus using a revenue-based allocation key”.

Another states that “rules will operate to impose a top-up tax using an effective tax rate test that is calculated on a jurisdictional basis and that uses a common definition of covered taxes and a tax base determined by reference to financial accounting income (with agreed adjustments consistent with the tax policy objectives of Pillar Two and mechanisms to address timing differences)”.


More rules are set to determine when a company’s foreign income should be included in the parent company’s taxable income, while another enables a country to reject a deduction on cross-border payments to the parent company. A further regulation makes it possible for countries to tax inter-company payments.

Anyone who is familiar with the field of tax avoidance can realize how many loopholes are hidden in such rules. All this mess would increase the effective average tax rate by only 0.7% across all jurisdictions, according to Tax Foundation experts. Since such reforms can be carried out only once in many years, this deal keeps afar the only feasible solution to tackling international tax avoidance – destination-based corporate taxation.

Most loopholes in international taxation stem from the fact that corporate tax is origin-based, not destination-based. An origin-based tax, such as corporate tax, is a tax where exports are taxed, while imports are exempt. The opposite is the case with destination-based taxes, such as value added tax (VAT) or sales tax, where imports are taxed while exports are exempt.

New tax rules only further complicate an already complicated process

Therefore, rather than creating another patch of rules that only further complicate what is already complicated enough, the reform that should be implemented is substituting the origin-based corporate tax for destination-based tax corporate tax.

Following such a reform, the tax on the multinational corporations will be dependent on the customers' location and not on the company's location, which many times is set only to minimize tax liability.

Accordingly, all tax planning of using fictitious transfer prices between affiliates in different jurisdictions or registering/placing the company in tax havens will be pointless. The tax would result from the customers' location and the price they pay, instead of the company's location and its transfer prices.

The customer's location is not in the control of the company and setting a lower price would reduce the company's net income more than it would reduce its tax liability. That is why these tax avoidance schemes won't work with destination-based corporate tax.

Reforms would mean there will be no more "race to the bottom". With a destination base, tax rate on capital can be equal to the tax rate on labour, thereby providing a fairer tax system counter to today, where tax competition lowers the tax on capital which is more mobile than labour.

Destination-based corporate tax means firms would be taxed where sales are made

With a destination-based corporate tax, all companies would be taxed at their sales destination without all these complex regulations as outlined by the OECD’s global tax deal. It will also eliminate the economic distortions that arise from fictitious transfer prices, tax shelters, tax planning and the authorities' costs tackling these plannings. Each enterprise will be located where it is most economically efficient, and not due to tax considerations.

Notice that economically speaking, it makes no difference whether exports or imports are being taxed. They are approximately the same size and so would the tax revenues be. After-tax profits would be the same with those two bases as the foreign exchange rate adjusts to offset the change.

To comprehend this exchange rate adjustment, let's consider the following example. Assuming that corporate tax is 20%, it can be showed that following the alternation of the tax base from exports to imports, the local currency would strengthen by 20%.

Thus, the exporters would lose 20%, but will not pay 20% tax as before. Their net income would remain unchanged, and the importers will gain 20% from the local currency appreciation which will be offset by the 20% tax they now can't deduct – leaving their net expenditure just the same as before the reform.

The only change will be with the exchange rate, all real variables such as the size of imports, exports and tax revenue will remain unchanged.


What's the World Economic Forum doing about tax?

Everyone who is international tax planning savvy knows that most of the tax planning is made via income tax, while VAT planning is neglectable and harder to carry out. That is mostly because income tax is an origin-based tax, while VAT is a destination-based tax.

Therefore, the conclusion must be that the only way to a just, simple, and efficient international tax system is a destination-based corporate tax.

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

What is needed for inclusive and sustainable global economic growth? Four leaders share their thoughts 

Liam Coleman

May 24, 2024

About Us



Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum