
The surprising thing about the backlash against globalization
Dani Rodrik on the reaction of the left to the backlash against globalization.
1979, AB in Government and Economics, Harvard College; 1981, Master's in Public Affairs, Princeton University; 1985, PhD in Economics, Princeton University. 1985-89, Assistant and 1989-92, Associate Professor of Public Policy, John F Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University; 1992-96, Professor of Economics and International Affairs, Columbia University; 1996-2013, Rafiq Hariri Professor of International Political Economy, Harvard University. Author of numerous articles, papers and books including: The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy (2011); One Economics, Many Recipes: Globalization, Institutions, and Economic Growth (2007); Making Openness Work: The New Global Economy and the Developing Countries (1999); Has Globalization Gone Too Far? (1997). Recipient of awards including, Albert O Hirschman Award, SSRC, and Leontief Prize, GDAE-Tufts. Expertise: international economic policy, economic development.
Dani Rodrik on the reaction of the left to the backlash against globalization.
We may be living in an age of revolutionary technological breakthroughs, but innovation alone isn't enough to benefit economies, argues Dani Rodrik.
The global trade regime can benefit both rich and poor countries, argues Dani Rodrik.
Dani Rodrik says both sides in the Trans-Pacific Partnership debate are using weak economic models.
A Harvard economist discusses public investment growth models.