Nature and Biodiversity

Why climate-smart land use is win-win

Diji Chandrasekharan Behr
Senior Natural Resource Economist, World Bank Group
Share:
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Nature and Biodiversity?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Future of the Environment is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

Future of the Environment

The energy at the Global Landscapes Forum held alongside the UNFCCC climate negotiations in Lima was electric—charged by the enthusiasm of the scientists, practitioners, indigenous peoples, investors, policy makers, youth and government negotiators who came together to share their latest innovations, tools and ideas for tackling climate change across land uses—from farms to forests and everything in between. Conversations were passionate as we discussed how to bring together our efforts to address climate change and achieve sustainable development at the landscape level—by working in a coordinated manner on agriculture, forests, water and more.

A notable shift at the 2014 Forum from previous ones, in addition to the mounting numbers in attendance (the event “sold out” with registration closing weeks early), was the buzz about adaptation. It permeated across panels and speakers, making clear the conversation on land-based sectors and climate change has moved well beyond mitigation. The Program on Forests (PROFOR) contributed to advancing the conversation by convening a high-level panel on “Moving forward with adaptation-based mitigation.”

Adaptation-based mitigation is a “win-win” approach that combines measures that can be taken to strengthen resilience to climate change with activities that help to bring carbon out of the atmosphere. For example, planting trees on farms to reduce the effect of extreme temperature or severe winds on soils and crops while also sequestering carbon. Put simply, it’s climate smart land management practices and it’s what we need to be doing.

What did we hear? We heard that adaptation-based mitigation is an imperative for developing countries. Pak Heru Prasetyo, Head of the REDD+ Management Agency in Indonesia, convincingly spoke about how countries like his that are heavily associated with the mitigation agenda see adaptation-based mitigation as a solution for rehabilitating degraded natural systems that must be revitalized to build environmental resilience to climate change. Mamadou Diakhite, Leader of the Sustainable Land and Water Management Program of the African Union’s NEPAD, stated that this was also true for countries in Africa where adaptation-based mitigation is a priority as it promises to positively impact the lives of the vulnerable and poor today, tomorrow and in the medium-term.

Mark Burrows, Managing Director and Vice Chairman, Global Investment Banking Credit Suisse, shared the story of a mining company in Australia that decided to pay indigenous peoples to continue their traditional practice setting small bush fires to prevent massive forest fires—linking climate adaptation needs with mitigation benefits and income for those who live on the land. Thinking outside the box, he challenged us to explore and develop new financial instruments to finance adaptation-based mitigation such as green bonds for ecosystems.

Bianca Jagger, Founder and Chair of the Bianca Jagger Human Rights Foundation and Bonn Challenge Ambassador, turned our attention toward how forest landscape restoration with its proven track record and global movement, can advance adaptation-based mitigation. Building on Rachel Kyte’s remark at Forest Day 2011 that adaptation-based mitigation is a “no-regrets option,” Bianca said it was a “no-brainer.”

The call to action was loud, clear, and inspiring. However, the panelists did not veil the challenges ahead. To make adaptation-based mitigation a reality, we need to tackle weak capacity, unclear rights, carbon monitoring and innovative financing. The commitment and momentum coming out of the Forum has me optimistic that if we pull together and build our coalitions further we might just get there. This is a no-brainer that will take all of us putting our heads together to solve it.

PROFOR is a multi-donor partnership housed at the World Bank Group that generates and shares innovative knowledge on forests. PROFOR was an implementing partner of the Forum, supporting CIFOR and UNEP as lead organizers of the event. For further information visit www.profor.info.

This article was first published on the World Bank’s Voices Perspectives on development. Publication does not imply endorsement of views by the World Economic Forum.

To keep up with Forum:Agenda subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Author: Diji Chandrasekharan Behr is a Senior Natural Resource Economist at the World Bank Group.

Image: A worker dries coffee beans at the Santa Adelaida coffee cooperative in La Libertad, on the outskirts of San Salvador December 10, 2012. REUTERS.

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Share:
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

What is Arbor Day and why is it important?

Dan Lambe

April 24, 2024

About Us

Events

Media

Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum