What happens when an economy becomes more volatile?

Laurent Belsie
Economics Editor, The Christian Science Monitor
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Geo-economics is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:


The more volatile a nation’s economy relative to its partners, the more resources its residents choose to hold in foreign assets, according to research reported inMacroeconomic Volatility and External Imbalances (NBER Working Paper No.20872). A 50 basis point (one-half of one percentage point) rise in the volatility of GDP over 10 years is positively associated with an increase in net foreign assets equal to around 8 percent of GDP, write authorsAlessandra Fogli and Fabrizio Perri. They develop an open-economy model to explain this dynamic, in which countries face shocks to their macroeconomic volatility.  volatility

“The key mechanism is precautionary motive: more uncertainty induces residents to save more, and higher savings are in part channeled into foreign assets,” they write. “We conclude that both data and theory suggest uncertainty/volatility is an important determinant of the medium/long run evolution of external imbalances in developed countries.”

This study suggests both empirically and theoretically that macroeconomic volatility is a major factor in explaining how some nations develop external imbalances and others don’t.

The authors’ empirical results were drawn from an analysis of all the OECD countries with comparable macroeconomic data beginning no later than the early 1980s. The estimated relation between volatility and imbalances is statistically significant and economically important.

From 1980 to 2010, for example, volatility in the United States – measured as the standard deviation of quarterly real GDP growth minus the average of the other countries’ standard deviation of quarterly real GDP growth over the interval – declined some 40 basis points. During that period, the net foreign assets of the U.S. fell by nearly 25 percent of GDP. Japan, by contrast, saw its relative volatility rise about 100 basis points. Its net foreign assets increased by 50 percent of GDP.

Many forces can lie behind these changes. In order to assess the effect of volatility separately from other factors, the study controls for many influences on a country’s net foreign asset position, including country characteristics such as the quality of its institutions, factors affecting all countries such as financial globalization or the rise of new industrial powers such as China and India, changes in the country’s growth rate, inflation, trade and financial openness, and finally demographic structure. Even after controlling for all these factors, the authors find that changes in relative volatility can explain between a fourth and a third of the observed changes in the net foreign assets across OECD nations.

A simple open-economy model in which countries suffer shocks to their productivity, and in which the degree of volatility of the shocks can vary, can quantitatively account for the observed cross-section of external imbalances and for the observed relation between volatility and imbalances.

“Macro uncertainty, as well as features shaping the precautionary motive, should be a major factor to consider when discussing the causes, the sustainability and desirability of observed global imbalances,” the authors conclude.

This article is published in collaboration with NBER. Publication does not imply endorsement of views by the World Economic Forum.

To keep up with the Agenda subscribe to our weekly newsletter.

Author: Laurent Belsie writes for NBER.

Image: A man looks at a stock quotation board outside a brokerage in Tokyo May 11, 2012. REUTERS/Toru Hanai

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

Red Sea attacks: What trade experts are saying about the shipping disruptions

Spencer Feingold

February 20, 2024

About Us



Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum