Manufacturing and Value Chains

Can feeding seaweed to cows help fight climate change?

Dairy cattle are pictured in a cowshed in Hergolding near Munich October 13, 2009.EU agriculture ministers concluded an extraordinary meeting on the crisis in the dairy sector on October 5 but did not come out with any short-term decisions to help struggling milk farmers, leaving them disappointed.   REUTERS/Michael Dalder    (GERMANY ENVIRONMENT POLITICS) - RTXPL5T

Adding just 2% seaweed to dried food can reduce methane emissions by 99% Image: REUTERS/Michael Dalder

John McKenna
Senior Writer, Formative Content
Share:
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Manufacturing and Value Chains?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Advanced Manufacturing is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

Advanced Manufacturing

Farmers will soon discover whether seaweed is a superfood that can grow bigger cows and battle climate change.

Researchers in Australia will this summer publish the results of a study on the effect feeding seaweed to cows has on methane emissions (90% of which come from burps).

Previous studies have suggested that mixing seaweed into cow’s feed can reduce their methane emissions by up to 99%.

Image: CNN

This could be a huge boost in the battle against climate change: global livestock emissions account for more than a seventh of all man-made greenhouse gas emissions, and methane is considered to be up to 30 times more harmful than carbon dioxide.

Growing bigger cows

Academics at Australia’s James Cook University found that adding just 2% seaweed to dried food can reduce methane emissions by 99%.

However, that research used an artificial cow’s stomach in a laboratory. The only real-life livestock results available to researchers were from a Canadian study that found feeding seaweed cut cow methane emissions by 20%, and studies that showed a 70% reduction in sheep methane emissions when 2% seaweed was added to their diet.

For the past year James Cook University researchers have been feeding cows seaweed at a facility run by Australia’s Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO).

They are expected to publish their results at the end of July.

As well as cutting emissions, they also hope to show that addition of seaweed can improve the health of cows and help them to grow bigger and stronger.

Methane emissions represent wasted energy, and reducing them could help the cows to be more efficient in processing their feed. This could potentially both help them grow stronger and reduce the amount of feed they need – cutting costs for cattle farmers.

Understandably, the research is attracting interest from farmers, academics and politicians around the world.

In Ireland, MP Michael Fitzmaurice hailed the potential to kickstart a new seaweed industry, while Irish farmers have said they support further investigation of seaweed’s potential to reduce cattle methane emissions.

The Universities of California and Stanford in the US are also reported to be taking seaweed samples from James Cook University to carry out their own tests.

Side effect warning

Despite seaweed’s potential to grow healthier and more environmentally friendly cattle, researchers in New Zealand have warned that there may be some harmful side effects.

Dr Andy Reisinger, the deputy director of the New Zealand Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Research Centre (NZAGRC), looked at the potential of seaweed in reducing livestock emissions with James Cook University six years ago.

They found that the main methane mitigation effects come from the chemical bromoform that is produced in the cow’s stomach when eating the seaweed, rather than the seaweed itself.

This is a problem, Dr Reisinger told NZFarmer, as bromoform has previously been shown to deplete the ozone layer. If cows start emitting bromoform instead of methane, it could result in swapping one environmental problem for another.

There is also limited evidence to suggest major exposure to bromoform may increase the risk of cancer in some animals.

Have you read?
Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Related topics:
Manufacturing and Value ChainsNature and Biodiversity
Share:
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

Why Large Language Models are the future of manufacturing

Andre S. Yoon and Kyoung Yeon Kim

April 23, 2024

About Us

Events

Media

Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum