Industries in Depth

40 years on from the first spam email, what have we learned? Here are 5 things you should know about junk mail

A young man works at his Apple computer during a weekend Hackathon event in San Francisco, California, U.S., July 16, 2016.    REUTERS/Gabrielle Lurie

107 trillion spam emails were sent in 2010 Image: REUTERS/Gabrielle Lurie

Rob Smith
Writer, Forum Agenda
Share:
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Industries in Depth?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how The Digital Economy is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

The Digital Economy

Spam accounted for around 60% of all emails sent in 2017 - but the problem has persisted for years. The first unsolicited bulk email was reportedly sent in 1978 by Gary Thuerk, a marketing manager promoting a new model of computer.

Thuerk pitched to roughly 400 prospects via ARPANET, a forerunner to the modern internet, and reaped $13 million in sales for his company. The e-marketing ploy wasn't without controversy, however, and as Thuerk himself recalls, "complaints started coming in almost immediately."

A few days after the original e-mail, an ARPAnet representative called Thuerk to voice his displeasure. "He made me promise never to do it again," he said.

Here are five other interesting facts you probably didn't know about unsolicited email.

Image: Statista

1. Spam costs billions each year

By 2010, an estimated 107 trillion pieces of spam email were being sent each year, costing around $130 billion per year in terms of lost productivity, energy costs and increased equipment cost.

A report by the UK government finds that in 2016, fraudulent emails cost citizens an estimated £10 billion, with almost 700,000 cases on cyber fraud recorded that year. The report says there could have been as many as 1.9 million incidents.

2. Botnets boosted spamming potential

And while Thuerk may have sent the world’s first spam email, the nuisance only truly exploded in 2003 with the introduction of “botnets”.

Botnets - a phrase that combines the words “robot” and “network” - were designed to send millions more junk emails per day than was previously possible.

A report by Eureka magazine identified a botnet known as Rustock. It’s is the largest botnet on record and the report says it infected over one million computers and could send 30 billion spam emails per day. It was taken down in 2011, after around five years in operation.

3. The spam capital of the world

The US is the world leader in spam, according to data from Spamhaus. The non-profit tracks spam and other related cyber threats. As of 4 May, there were more than 3,000 live spam sessions in the US. China and Russia complete the top 3, while the UK, Japan and Brazil all feature.

4. Most spam is about healthcare

Healthcare-related junk email accounted for almost 27% of the global total in 2017, the most of any content category, Statista says. Following this, Malware equated to over a quarter of all spam sent, while dating-related spam accounted for over 21%.

5. Spam isn’t effective

While trillions of spam email are being sent every year, very few have the desired effect. Tech company Oracle + Dyn says that of 350 million spam email sent across a 26-day period during a test, click-throughs translated to just 28 sales. That equates to an effectiveness of one-in-12 million.

Email marketing and automation platform GetResponse also says that just 0.02% of all spam sent globally is opened. The open rate for emails we expect and have subscribed to, for example, is considerably more than this, at almost 25%.

Globally, the Dutch open the most expected email, at 43% Image: GetResponse
Have you read?
Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Share:
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

Why having low-carbon buildings also makes financial sense

Guy Grainger

September 18, 2024

About us

Engage with us

  • Sign in
  • Partner with us
  • Become a member
  • Sign up for our press releases
  • Subscribe to our newsletters
  • Contact us

Quick links

Language editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

Sitemap

© 2024 World Economic Forum