Circular Economy

Our idea of what makes a company successful needs to change. And it starts with making waste expensive

A customs officer of the harbour customs authority walks trough shredded counterfeit Nike, Adidas and Puma trainers at the Hamburg harbour November 14, 2006. Some 117 containers with over two million counterfeit trainers and watches worth up to 383 million euros, have been seized since the end of August 2006 Hamburg customs said.   REUTERS/Christian Charisius (GERMANY)

Making waste more expensive gives an added incentive to recycling. Image: REUTERS/Christian Charisius

Joe Myers
Writer, Forum Agenda
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Circular Economy?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Circular Economy is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

Circular Economy

What makes a company successful? Profitability? Growth? Maybe both.

But this, according to Dimitri de Vreeze, a member of the managing board of Dutch health, nutrition and materials company Royal DSM, is an outdated approach to doing business.

As he explained during the Climate Technologies session at the World Economic Forum’s Annual Meeting of the New Champions in Tianjin, successful companies need to consider their social and environmental responsibilities as well as their profits.

This means focusing on the triple bottom line of “people, planet and profit”, and taking “a holistic view of what you deliver to the world,” he said, referring to the vast amounts of waste that businesses generate.


Waste should have a price

So how can we reduce waste?

By making it expensive, de Vreeze suggested. Today, only 9% of what we produce is “circular”, he said. That means the remaining 91% is incinerated, sent to landfill or disposed of elsewhere. “That is unacceptable and has to change.”

But paying for waste would require a shift in mindset: we’d have to change the way we think about economic value.

If we had to pay to create waste and carbon pollution, then climate-friendly innovation would increase and clean energy sources would become more attractive to businesses, argued de Vreeze.

Have you read?

Charging polluters

Carbon pricing systems charge emitters for their carbon pollution, typically through a tax or an emissions-trading scheme.

The cost is designed to persuade polluters to reduce their emissions. And following the UN’s COP21 climate change conference, where global leaders announced a carbon pricing initiative, de Vreeze said there’s been increased acceptance that this is the way forward.

In the case of the European Union’s emissions trading scheme, the price has risen to above €20 (US$23). And continued price increases will drive change in economic thinking and behaviour, he argued.

Imagine being charged €20 for every bag of rubbish you send to landfill. You’d probably do things a little differently, wouldn’t you, he said.

Going round in circles

The bigger picture is the eradication of waste through a circular economy.

The concept is simple: no waste is produced because products are designed to be recycled, restored and reused; the use of toxic chemicals is eliminated; and energy comes from renewable sources.

The circular economy Image: World Economic Forum

This approach – a change from current linear models – will help us tackle climate change and reduce our impact on the environment.

The problem though, as de Vreeze explained, is that just a small percentage of what we produce ends up in the circular economy.

To remove waste from the economy, consumers, suppliers and governments will all have to work together.

But, if we could make it happen, this would be a huge step towards a more sustainable world.

DSM is a member of the CE100, the Ellen MacArthur Foundation's global engagement platform which involves academia, cities and governments, emerging innovators and corporates.

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Related topics:
Circular EconomyFuture of the Environment
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

5 ways to boost e-waste recycling – and why it matters

Johnny Wood

February 14, 2024

About Us



Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum